Fernandes de Jesus Julio, de Almeida Novello Aline, Bezerra Nakaoka Gustavo, Curcio Dos Reis Amir, Fukuda Thiago Yukio, Fernandes Bryk Flavio
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Sena Madureira, 1500, CEP 04021-001 São Paulo, Brazil.
Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Rua Cesário Mota Jr., 112, CEP 01221-020 São Paulo, Brazil.
Phys Ther Sport. 2016 Mar;18:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
To analyze kinesio taping (KT) effect on quadriceps strength and lower limb function over a 7-day period.
Blind randomized clinical trial.
Hospital's Physical Therapy Department.
Sixty healthy individuals (30 men and 30 women) were randomly distributed into three groups: Control--without KT application; Placebo--placebo KT application and Experimental--A KT application designed to stimulate quadriceps femoris activity.
The quadriceps strength was measured using a manual dynamometer whereas lower limb function was assessed using the Single Hop Test for Distance. Evaluations occurred at five time-points: baseline; immediately, 3 and 5 days after KT application; and 72 h post KT withdrawal.
There was no significant interaction between time-points and groups for muscle strength: dominant (P = 0.13) and non-dominant (P = 0.41) and lower limb function: dominant (P = 0.09) and non-dominant (P = 0.53); but lower limb function within-group comparisons showed improvements in all groups at the evolution of all time-points analyzed for both limbs (P = 0.001). This is possibly due to a learning effect as the participants became more familiar with executing the assessment tests.
KT did not improve quadriceps strength and lower limb function of healthy individuals and its application with these objectives should be reconsidered.
分析肌内效贴布(KT)在7天内对股四头肌力量和下肢功能的影响。
双盲随机临床试验。
医院理疗科。
60名健康个体(30名男性和30名女性)被随机分为三组:对照组——不使用KT贴布;安慰剂组——使用安慰剂KT贴布;实验组——使用旨在刺激股四头肌活动的KT贴布。
使用手动测力计测量股四头肌力量,使用单跳距离测试评估下肢功能。在五个时间点进行评估:基线;KT贴布应用后立即、3天和5天;以及KT贴布去除后72小时。
在肌肉力量方面,时间点与组间不存在显著交互作用:优势侧(P = 0.13)和非优势侧(P = 0.41);在下肢功能方面,优势侧(P = 0.09)和非优势侧(P = 0.53)也不存在显著交互作用;但组内下肢功能比较显示,在分析的所有时间点,两下肢所有组均有改善(P = 0.001)。这可能是由于学习效应,因为参与者对执行评估测试更加熟悉。
KT并未改善健康个体的股四头肌力量和下肢功能,应重新考虑将其用于这些目的。