Suppr超能文献

结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术患者穿孔的预测模型及风险评分

Prediction model and risk score for perforation in patients undergoing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

作者信息

Hong Sung Noh, Byeon Jeong Sik, Lee Bo-In, Yang Dong-Hoon, Kim Jinsu, Cho Kwang Bum, Cho Jin Woong, Jang Hyun Joo, Jeon Seong Woo, Jung Sung Ae, Chang Dong Kyung

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jul;84(1):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.011. Epub 2015 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Perforation is the adverse event of greatest concern during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Accurate risk prediction of perforation may enable prevention strategies and selection of the most efficient therapeutic option. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for ESD-induced perforation.

METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed on 2046 patients who underwent colorectal ESD at 9 Korean ESD Study Group-affiliated hospitals. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into either a derivation set or a validation set. In the derivation set, a prediction score was constructed to assess the risk of perforation using preoperative and procedural-related predictors selected via logistic regression. Discrimination and calibration of the prediction model was assessed using the validation set.

RESULTS

An ESD-induced perforation occurred in 135 patients (6.6%). In the derivation set, multivariate logistic regression identified endoscopist experience (≥50 ESDs: odds ratio [OR] = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-1.00), tumor size (+1-cm increments: OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.62), colonic location (OR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.24-3.89), and submucosal fibrosis (OR = 2.00; 95% CI, 1.04-3.87) as predictive factors (C-statistic = 0.678; 95% CI, 0.617-0.739). In the validation set, the model showed good discrimination (C-statistic = 0.675; 95% CI, 0.615-0.735) and calibration (P = .635). When a simplified weighted scoring system based on the OR was used, risk of perforation ranged from 4.1% (95% CI, 2.8%-5.9%) in the low-risk group (score ≤4) to 11.6% (95% CI, 8.5%-15.6%) in the high-risk group (score >4).

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed and internally validated a score consisting of simple clinical factors to estimate the risk of colorectal ESD-induced perforation. This score can be used to identify patients at high risk before colorectal ESD.

摘要

背景与目的

穿孔是结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)期间最值得关注的不良事件。准确预测穿孔风险有助于制定预防策略并选择最有效的治疗方案。本研究旨在开发并验证一种用于预测ESD所致穿孔的风险预测模型。

方法

对韩国ESD研究组下属9家医院的2046例行结直肠ESD的患者进行了一项多中心横断面研究。将纳入的患者随机分为推导集或验证集。在推导集中,构建一个预测评分,使用通过逻辑回归选择的术前及手术相关预测因素来评估穿孔风险。使用验证集评估预测模型的辨别力和校准情况。

结果

135例患者(6.6%)发生了ESD所致穿孔。在推导集中,多因素逻辑回归确定内镜医师经验(≥50例ESD:比值比[OR]=0.59;95%置信区间[CI],0.35 - 1.00)、肿瘤大小(每增加1 cm:OR = 1.39;95% CI,1.19 - 1.62)、结肠部位(OR = 2.20;95% CI,1.24 - 3.89)和黏膜下纤维化(OR = 2.00;95% CI,1.04 - 3.87)为预测因素(C统计量 = 0.678;95% CI,0.617 - 0.739)。在验证集中,该模型显示出良好的辨别力(C统计量 = 0.675;95% CI,0.615 - 0.735)和校准情况(P = 0.635)。当使用基于OR的简化加权评分系统时,穿孔风险在低风险组(评分≤4)为4.1%(95% CI,2.8% - 5.9%),在高风险组(评分>4)为11.6%(95% CI,8.5% - 15.6%)。

结论

本研究开发并在内部验证了一个由简单临床因素组成的评分系统,用于估计结直肠ESD所致穿孔的风险。该评分可用于在结直肠ESD前识别高危患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验