Suppr超能文献

二肽基肽酶4抑制剂与磺脲类药物治疗2型糖尿病患者的获益与风险:来自随机对照试验的累积证据

The benefits and risks of DPP4-inhibitors vs. sulfonylureas for patients with type 2 diabetes: accumulated evidence from randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Zhou J-B, Bai L, Wang Y, Yang J-K

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Geriatrics, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Feb;70(2):132-41. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12761. Epub 2015 Dec 28.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase 4-inhibitors (DPP4-I) compared with sulphonylureas in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) mellitus.

METHOD

Randomised controlled trials were collected from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and conference. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included weight gain, the change in postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), insulin resistance and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), adverse event (AE) and incidence of hypoglycaemia.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies including 5480 patients randomised to DPP4-I and 5214 patients randomised to sulphonylureas were eligible for the meta-analysis. Compared with sulphonylureas, DPP4-I were associated with a smaller decline in HbA1c (WMD, weighted mean differences 0.08%, 95% CI: 0.03-0.14, p = 0.001), and resulted in weight loss of 1.945 kg (95% CI: -2.237 to -1.653, p < 0.0001). The effect of DPP4-I lowering FPG was inferior to that of sulfonylureas (WMD, 0.268 mmol/l, 95% CI, 0.151-0.385, p < 0.0001), and similar in reducing PPG (WMD, 0.084, 95% CI, -0.701 to 0.869, p = 0.833). According to the follow-up period, the included trials were separated into three groups (group 1: less than half one year, group 2: from half one year to 1 year, group 3: more than 1 year). Subgroup analysis showed that the difference in HbA1c between DPP4-I and sulphonylureas presented a decline curve (group 1: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.15-0.84, group 2: 0.05, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.15, group 3: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.03-0.15). DPP4-I had a favourable insulin resistance compared with sulfonylureas (WMD, -0.673, 95% CI, -1.248 to -0.097, p = 0.022). In addition, compared with sulfonylureas, DPP4-I was associated with a decrease in overall risk for AE (RR, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.91-0.96, p < 0.0001). The incidence of hypoglycaemia was lower with DPP4-I (RR, 0.24, 95% CI, 0.21-0.27, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with T2D who receive DPP4-I could achieve almost similar glycaemic targets with sulphonylureas, with favourable effects on body weight and lower incidence of hypoglycaemia.

摘要

目的

评估二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP4-I)与磺脲类药物相比,在2型糖尿病(T2D)成年患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

从PubMed、EMBASE、谷歌学术和会议中收集随机对照试验。主要结局是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化。次要结局包括体重增加、餐后血糖(PPG)变化、胰岛素抵抗和空腹血糖(FPG)、不良事件(AE)和低血糖发生率。

结果

14项研究符合荟萃分析条件,其中5480例患者随机接受DPP4-I治疗,5214例患者随机接受磺脲类药物治疗。与磺脲类药物相比,DPP4-I与HbA1c下降幅度较小有关(加权平均差[WMD]为0.08%,95%置信区间[CI]:0.03-0.14,p=0.001),并导致体重减轻1.945千克(95%CI:-2.237至-1.653,p<0.0001)。DPP4-I降低FPG的效果不如磺脲类药物(WMD为0.268毫摩尔/升,95%CI:0.151-0.385,p<0.0001),而在降低PPG方面效果相似(WMD为0.084,95%CI:-0.701至0.869,p=0.833)。根据随访期,纳入的试验分为三组(第1组:少于半年,第2组:半年至1年,第3组:超过1年)。亚组分析显示,DPP4-I与磺脲类药物之间HbA1c的差异呈下降曲线(第1组:0.50,95%CI:0.15-0.84;第2组:0.05,95%CI:-0.05至0.15;第3组:0.09,95%CI:0.03-0.15)。与磺脲类药物相比,DPP4-I具有较好的胰岛素抵抗(WMD为-0.673,95%CI:-1.248至-0.097,p=0.022)。此外,与磺脲类药物相比,DPP4-I与AE总体风险降低有关(风险比[RR]为0.93,95%CI:0.91-0.96,p<而DPP4-I组低血糖发生率较低(RR为0.24,95%CI:0.21-0.27,p<0.001)。

结论

接受DPP4-I治疗的T2D患者与接受磺脲类药物治疗的患者血糖目标实现情况几乎相似,对体重有有利影响,且低血糖发生率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验