Suppr超能文献

原发性和继发性气胸的肺实质评估。

Lung Parenchymal Assessment in Primary and Secondary Pneumothorax.

机构信息

1 Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

2 Department of Radiology, North Bristol National Health Service Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Mar;13(3):350-5. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-584OC.

Abstract

RATIONALE

The definition of primary spontaneous pneumothorax excludes patients with known lung disease; however, the assumption that the underlying lung is normal in these patients is increasingly contentious.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess lung structure and compare the extent of emphysema in patients with primary versus secondary spontaneous pneumothorax and to patients with no pneumothorax in an otherwise comparable control group.

METHODS

We identified patients treated for pneumothorax by screening inpatient and outpatient medical records at one medical center in the United Kingdom. From this group, 20 patients had no clinically apparent underlying lung disease and were classified as having a primary spontaneous pneumothorax, and 20 patients were classified as having a secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. We assembled a control group composed of 40 subjects matched for age and smoking history who had a unilateral pleural effusion or were suspected to have a thoracic malignancy and had a chest computed tomography scan suitable for quantitative analysis. Demographics and smoking histories were collected. Quantitative evaluation of low-attenuation areas of the lung on computed tomography imaging was performed using semiautomated software, and the extent of emphysema-like destruction was assessed visually.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The extent of emphysema and percentage of low-attenuation areas was greater for patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax than for control subjects matched for age and smoking history (median, 0.25 vs. 0.00%; P = 0.019) and was also higher for patients with secondary pneumothorax than those with primary spontaneous pneumothorax (16.15 vs. 0.25%, P < 0.001). Patients with primary pneumothorax who smoked had significantly greater low-attenuation area than patients with primary pneumothorax who were nonsmokers (0.7 vs. 0.1%, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax had quantifiable evidence of parenchymal destruction and emphysema. The exclusion of patients with underlying lung disease from the definition of primary spontaneous pneumothorax should be reappraised.

摘要

背景

原发性自发性气胸的定义排除了已知肺部疾病的患者;然而,这些患者的基础肺部正常的假设越来越受到争议。

目的

本研究旨在评估肺部结构,并比较原发性与继发性自发性气胸患者以及无气胸的对照组患者肺气肿的严重程度。

方法

我们通过筛选英国一家医疗中心的住院和门诊病历,确定了气胸患者。在这组患者中,20 名患者没有明显的潜在肺部疾病,被归类为原发性自发性气胸,20 名患者被归类为继发性自发性气胸。我们组建了一个对照组,由 40 名年龄和吸烟史相匹配的患者组成,他们患有单侧胸腔积液或疑似患有胸壁恶性肿瘤,且有适合定量分析的胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)。收集了人口统计学和吸烟史数据。使用半自动软件对 CT 图像上的低衰减区进行定量评估,并通过视觉评估肺气肿样破坏的程度。

测量和主要结果

与年龄和吸烟史匹配的对照组相比,原发性自发性气胸患者的肺气肿程度和低衰减区比例更高(中位数,0.25 对 0.00%;P=0.019),继发性气胸患者的肺气肿程度也高于原发性自发性气胸患者(16.15 对 0.25%,P<0.001)。与不吸烟的原发性气胸患者相比,吸烟的原发性气胸患者的低衰减区面积明显更大(0.7 对 0.1%,P=0.034)。

结论

大多数原发性自发性气胸患者有可量化的实质破坏和肺气肿证据。从原发性自发性气胸的定义中排除潜在肺部疾病患者的做法应重新评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验