• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术经验对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后渗漏率的影响。

Impact of the Surgical Experience on Leak Rate After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

作者信息

Noel Patrick, Nedelcu Marius, Gagner Michel

机构信息

Hôpital Prive La Casamance, Aubagne, France.

Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, Place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2016 Aug;26(8):1782-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-2003-1.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-015-2003-1
PMID:26712495
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures, largely due to several advantages it carries over more complex bariatric procedures. LSG is generally considered a straightforward procedure, but one of the major concerns is a staple line leak.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the correlation between surgeon's experience and leak rate and to assess the different risk factors for developing a gastric leak after LSG.

SETTING

Private hospital, France.

METHODS

The analysis of a single surgeon's yearly leak rate since the introduction of LSG for possible risk factors was done.

RESULTS

A total of 2012 LSGs were performed in between September, 2005 and December, 2014. Twenty cases (1 %) of gastric leak were recorded. Of these, 17 patients were women (94.4 %) with a mean age of 39.4 years (range 22-61) and mean body mass index (BMI) 41.2 kg/m(2) (range 34.8-57.1). On a yearly basis, the leak rate was 4.8 % (2006), 5.7 % (2007), 0 (2008), 2.6 % (2009), 2 % (2010), 0.8 % (2011), 0.6 % (2012), 0.2 % (2013), and 0 (2014). In the first 1000 cases (group A), there were 18 cases of gastric leak and in the last 1000 cases, there were 800 with GORE® SEAMGUARD® Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement (group B) 2 cases of gastric leak (p = 0.009). A revisional LSG, 395 patients after gastric banding and 61 patients re-sleeve gastrectomy, was performed in 456 cases (22.7 %). There were 3 cases of leak (0.65 %). There were two deaths.

CONCLUSION

LSG can be performed with a low complication rate. This large series of a single surgeon's experience demonstrated that the leak rate after LSG could be significantly decreased over time with changes in techniques.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)已成为最常用的减肥手术之一,这主要归功于它相较于更复杂的减肥手术所具有的诸多优势。LSG一般被认为是一种简单直接的手术,但主要问题之一是吻合钉线漏。

目的

本研究的目的是评估外科医生经验与漏率之间的相关性,并评估LSG术后发生胃漏的不同风险因素。

地点

法国私立医院。

方法

对自开展LSG以来单一外科医生每年的漏率进行分析,以寻找可能的风险因素。

结果

2005年9月至2014年12月期间共进行了2012例LSG手术。记录到20例(1%)胃漏病例。其中,17例患者为女性(94.4%),平均年龄39.4岁(范围22 - 61岁),平均体重指数(BMI)为41.2kg/m²(范围34.8 - 57.1)。按年份来看,漏率分别为4.8%(2006年)、5.7%(2007年)、0(2008年)、2.6%(2009年)、2%(2010年)、0.8%(2011年)、0.6%(2012年)、0.2%(2013年)和0(2014年)。在前1000例病例(A组)中,有18例胃漏;在最后1000例病例中,800例使用了戈尔® SEAMGUARD® 生物可吸收吻合钉线加固材料(B组),有2例胃漏(p = 0.009)。456例(22.7%)患者进行了翻修性LSG,其中395例为胃束带术后患者,61例为再次袖状胃切除术患者。有3例漏(0.65%)。有2例死亡。

结论

LSG手术并发症发生率较低。这一基于单一外科医生大量经验的研究表明,随着技术的改进,LSG术后的漏率会随时间显著降低。

相似文献

1
Impact of the Surgical Experience on Leak Rate After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.手术经验对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后渗漏率的影响。
Obes Surg. 2016 Aug;26(8):1782-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-2003-1.
2
Reinforcement of the Staple Line during Gastric Sleeve: A Comparison of Buttressing or Oversewing, No Reinforcement- A Single-Institution Study.胃袖状切除术期间吻合钉线的加固:支撑或缝合加固与不加固的比较——一项单机构研究
Am Surg. 2018 May 1;84(5):690-694.
3
Current role of staple line reinforcement in 30-day outcomes of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of MBSAQIP data, 2015-2016 PUF.2015-2016 年 MBSAQIP 数据 PUF 分析:缝线加固在原发性腹腔镜袖状胃切除术 30 天结果中的当前作用。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1454-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
4
Staple Line Reinforcement in Laparoscopic SleeveGastrectomy: Experience in 1023 Consecutive Cases.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中吻合钉线加固:1023例连续病例的经验
Obes Surg. 2017 Jun;27(6):1474-1480. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2530-4.
5
Short-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: does staple line reinforcement matter?病态肥胖患者袖状胃切除术的短期疗效:吻合钉加固重要吗?
Obes Surg. 2014 Jul;24(7):1109-16. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1251-9.
6
Evaluating the effect of operative technique on leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case-control study.评估手术技术对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后渗漏的影响:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Apr;13(4):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
7
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy as Revisional Procedures after Adjustable Gastric Band: 5-Year Outcomes.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术作为可调节胃束带术后修正手术的5年结果
Obes Surg. 2017 Jun;27(6):1430-1437. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2502-8.
8
Use of fibrin glue in bariatric surgery: analysis of complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on 450 consecutive patients.纤维蛋白胶在减重手术中的应用:对450例连续接受腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者术后并发症的分析
Updates Surg. 2021 Feb;73(1):305-311. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00865-9. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
9
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure for failed gastric banding: lessons from 300 consecutive cases.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为胃束带术失败后的修正手术:来自300例连续病例的经验教训。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.045. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
10
Outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with and without staple line oversewing in morbidly obese patients: a randomized study.病态肥胖患者行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术时缝合与不缝合吻合钉线的效果:一项随机研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Nov;23(11):895-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0137. Epub 2013 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of complete gastric staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中完全胃吻合钉线生物可吸收加固的评估:倾向评分匹配分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02326-7.
2
Bariatric surgery: trends in utilization, complications, conversions and revisions.减重手术:利用、并发症、转化和修订的趋势。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4613-4623. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10985-7. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
Impact of Helicobacter pylori Status on Postoperative Morbidities After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in an Endemic Region (a Retrospective Multicentric Study).

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome of leaks after sleeve gastrectomy based on a new algorithm adressing leak size and gastric stenosis.基于一种处理漏口大小和胃狭窄的新算法的袖状胃切除术后漏口的结局
Obes Surg. 2015 Mar;25(3):559-63. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1561-y.
2
The Preceding Surgeon Factor in Bariatric Surgery: a Positive Influence on the Learning Curve of Subsequent Surgeons.减重手术中的前任外科医生因素:对后续外科医生学习曲线的积极影响。
Obes Surg. 2015 Aug;25(8):1417-24. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1538-x.
3
A comparison of a single center's experience with three staple line reinforcement techniques in 1,502 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients.
幽门螺杆菌状态对地方性流行区域腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后并发症的影响(一项回顾性多中心研究)
Obes Surg. 2024 Jan;34(1):183-191. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06961-0. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
4
Uncommon Complication of a Biliary Leak After Adjustable Gastric Band Removal: A Case Report.可调节胃束带移除术后胆汁漏的罕见并发症:一例报告
Cureus. 2023 Oct 11;15(10):e46856. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46856. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Classification of Slippage Following Laparoscopic BariClip Gastroplasty.腹腔镜 BariClip 胃成形术后的滑脱分类。
Obes Surg. 2023 Oct;33(10):3317-3322. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06780-3. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
6
Applications of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract.内镜下真空治疗在上消化道的应用。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Jun 16;15(6):420-433. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i6.420.
7
The clinical effectiveness of staple line reinforcement with different matrix used in surgery.手术中使用不同基质进行吻合口加固的临床效果。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jun 7;11:1178619. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1178619. eCollection 2023.
8
Meta-analysis of patient risk factors associated with post-bariatric surgery leak.与减重手术后渗漏相关的患者风险因素的Meta分析。
Obes Sci Pract. 2022 Jul 15;9(2):112-126. doi: 10.1002/osp4.628. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
Is the Surgical Drainage Mandatory for Leak after Sleeve Gastrectomy?袖状胃切除术后渗漏必须进行手术引流吗?
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 9;12(4):1376. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041376.
10
The Utility of Video Recording in Assessing Bariatric Surgery Complications.视频记录在评估减肥手术并发症中的作用
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 22;11(19):5573. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195573.
单中心对1502例腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者采用三种吻合线加固技术的经验比较。
Obes Surg. 2015 Mar;25(3):418-22. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1432-6.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in four staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.四种吻合口加固方式下腹腔镜袖状胃切除术漏率的比较:一项系统评价
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):713-23. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
5
Bariatric surgery trends in France: 2005-2011.法国的减重手术趋势:2005-2011 年。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Mar-Apr;10(2):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.015. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
6
Survey on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the Fourth International Consensus Summit on Sleeve Gastrectomy.第四届国际袖状胃切除术共识峰会关于腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的调查。
Obes Surg. 2013 Dec;23(12):2013-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1040-x.
7
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: how I do it.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:我的手术方法。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Feb;23(1):e14-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318274b8cf.
8
Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011.全球代谢/减重手术 2011 年报告
Obes Surg. 2013 Apr;23(4):427-36. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0.
9
Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后漏的可能减少的手术策略:9991 例的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):231-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826cc714.
10
Gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter experience with 2,834 patients.袖状胃切除术后胃漏:2834 例多中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):240-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2426-x. Epub 2012 Jun 30.