• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科治疗并出院的儿童轻度创伤性脑损伤神经认知测试的效用

Utility of neurocognitive testing of mild traumatic brain injury in children treated and released from the emergency department.

作者信息

Nance Michael L, Callahan James M, Tharakan Sasha J, Malamet Peter, Houseknecht Eileen M, Mahoney Kaitilin R, Wiebe Douglas J

机构信息

a Department of Surgery.

b Department of Pediatrics , Division of Emergency Medicine.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2016;30(2):184-90. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1075591. Epub 2015 Dec 29.

DOI:10.3109/02699052.2015.1075591
PMID:26714064
Abstract

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To assess feasibility and utility of neurocognitive testing of children evaluated and discharged from the ED with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI).

METHODS

Paediatric blunt trauma patients (aged 11-18 years) evaluated in the ED for MTBI and control patients with isolated lower extremity injury were prospectively enrolled. All patients were administered a validated neurocognitive test (ImPACT(©)). Wilcoxon sign rank tests were used to compare reported symptoms and neurocognitive performance between subjects and controls, as well as to matched normative data.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine subjects and 46 controls were enrolled. The MTBI patients had a mean age of 13.9 years (53.8% male). An abnormal symptom score was reported in 89.7% of MTBI subjects (mean score = 29.4, normal ≤ 8), differing significantly (p < 0.05) from controls, in whom 39.1% demonstrated an abnormal score (mean score = 8.7). In all neurocognitive test domains, visual motor speed and reaction time, MTBI patients demonstrated lower scores than normative data (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MTBI were more likely than control subjects to have scores on any or all neurocognitive domains below the 25th percentile and 10th percentile. In the ED setting, acute neurocognitive testing of MTBI in children is feasible. This highlights the importance of structured follow-up for this treated and released population.

摘要

主要目的

评估对因轻度创伤性脑损伤(MTBI)在急诊科接受评估并出院的儿童进行神经认知测试的可行性和实用性。

方法

前瞻性纳入在急诊科因MTBI接受评估的儿科钝性创伤患者(年龄11 - 18岁)以及孤立性下肢损伤的对照患者。所有患者均接受经过验证的神经认知测试(ImPACT(©))。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验来比较受试者与对照组之间报告的症状和神经认知表现,以及与匹配的常模数据进行比较。

结果

共纳入39名受试者和46名对照。MTBI患者的平均年龄为13.9岁(53.8%为男性)。89.7%的MTBI受试者报告有异常症状评分(平均评分 = 29.4,正常≤8),与对照组有显著差异(p < 0.05),对照组中有39.1%表现出异常评分(平均评分 = 8.7)。在所有神经认知测试领域,即视觉运动速度和反应时间方面,MTBI患者的得分低于常模数据(p < 0.05)。

结论

MTBI患者在任何或所有神经认知领域的得分低于第25百分位数和第10百分位数的可能性高于对照受试者。在急诊科环境中,对儿童MTBI进行急性神经认知测试是可行的。这突出了对这一接受治疗并出院人群进行结构化随访的重要性。

相似文献

1
Utility of neurocognitive testing of mild traumatic brain injury in children treated and released from the emergency department.急诊科治疗并出院的儿童轻度创伤性脑损伤神经认知测试的效用
Brain Inj. 2016;30(2):184-90. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1075591. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
2
Neurocognitive evaluation of mild traumatic brain injury in the hospitalized pediatric population.住院儿科人群中轻度创伤性脑损伤的神经认知评估。
Ann Surg. 2009 May;249(5):859-63. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a41ae5.
3
Prospective, Head-to-Head Study of Three Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment Tools Part 2: Utility for Assessment of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Emergency Department Patients.三种计算机化神经认知评估工具的前瞻性、头对头研究 第2部分:在急诊科患者中评估轻度创伤性脑损伤的效用
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Apr;23(4):293-303. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717000157. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
4
Cognition in the Emergency Department as a Predictor of Recovery after Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.急诊科认知功能作为小儿轻度创伤性脑损伤后恢复情况的预测指标
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 Apr;22(4):379-87. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715001368. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
5
Evaluation of the standardized assessment of concussion in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊中脑震荡的标准化评估评价。
Pediatrics. 2010 Oct;126(4):688-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2804. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
6
Neurocognition in the emergency department after a mild traumatic brain injury in youth.青少年轻度创伤性脑损伤后急诊科的神经认知情况
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Oct 15;31(20):1744-9. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3356. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
7
Follow-up issues in children with mild traumatic brain injuries.轻度创伤性脑损伤患儿的随访问题
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Aug;18(2):224-30. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.PEDS15511. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
8
iPad-Based Neurocognitive Testing (ImPACT-QT) in Acute Adult Mild Traumatic Brain Injury/Concussion: Study on Practicality and Bedside Cognitive Scores in a Level-1 Trauma Center.基于 iPad 的神经认知测试(ImPACT-QT)在急性成人轻度创伤性脑损伤/脑震荡中的应用:在 1 级创伤中心的实用性和床边认知评分研究。
Am Surg. 2024 Jun;90(6):1570-1576. doi: 10.1177/00031348241246168. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
9
Detailed concussion symptom analysis in a paediatric ED population.儿科急诊科人群的详细脑震荡症状分析。
Brain Inj. 2011;25(10):943-9. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.597043. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
10
Assessment of mild traumatic brain injury with the King-Devick Test in an emergency department sample.在急诊科样本中使用King-Devick测试评估轻度创伤性脑损伤。
Brain Inj. 2014;28(12):1590-3. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.943287. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Concussion Guidelines Step 2: Evidence for Subtype Classification.脑震荡指南第二步:亚型分类的证据。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(1):2-13. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz332.
2
Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Acute Setting.急性环境下的小儿轻度创伤性脑损伤
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Sep;33(9):643-649. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001252.