Suppr超能文献

老年患者腹腔镜辅助与开放远端胃癌根治术的回顾性比较研究

Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in elderly patients: a retrospective comparative study.

作者信息

Zheng Lijun, Lu Liesheng, Jiang Xun, Jian Wei, Liu Zhongchen, Zhou Donglei

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, No. 301 Middle Yanchang road, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4069-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4722-8. Epub 2015 Dec 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the current increased longevity in elderly population, surgeons can expect to operate more frequently on elderly patients with both malignancies and comorbid medical conditions. This study aimed to compare the surgical and early postoperative outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with those of open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for gastric cancer in patients 70 years of age or older.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis based on a prospectively collected database of elderly patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy or ODG from February 2013 to January 2014. Preoperative patient baseline parameters, surgical and oncological outcomes, postoperative complications and pathologic results were analyzed in this report.

RESULTS

Distal gastrectomy was performed for 50 patients with the age of 70 years or older, using laparoscopic surgery for 23 patients (LADG group) and open surgery for 27 patients (ODG group). The mean age of LADG group was 76.6 years and ODG group 80.0 years. The comparison between the two groups revealed statistically similar results regarding age, gender, BMI, ASA class, history of previous surgeries, CCI and pathologic characteristics. The LADG group was characterized by less intraoperative blood loss (LADG group 100 mL vs. ODG group 250 mL, P < 0.001), less narcotic use (LADG group 1 day vs. ODG group 3 days, P < 0.001), faster bowel function recovery (time to first flatus: LADG group 51.6 h vs. ODG group 67.2 h, P < 0.001; days to oral intake: LADG group 6.1 days vs. ODG group 7.9 days, P = 0.002) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (LADG group 12 days vs. ODG group 16 days, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative complication rate (overall complication rate: LADG group 21.7 % vs. ODG group 25.9 %, P = 0.730), survival rate (P = 0.719), postoperative recurrence and metastasis rate between the patients who underwent LADG and ODG.

CONCLUSIONS

LADG for gastric cancer is feasible, efficacious and safe in elderly patients and may be superior to conventional open resection as regards some surgical outcomes.

摘要

背景

随着当前老年人口寿命的延长,外科医生预计会更频繁地为患有恶性肿瘤和合并内科疾病的老年患者进行手术。本研究旨在比较70岁及以上胃癌患者腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LADG)与开放远端胃切除术(ODG)的手术及术后早期结果。

方法

基于前瞻性收集的2013年2月至2014年1月接受腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术或ODG的老年患者数据库进行回顾性分析。本报告分析了术前患者基线参数、手术及肿瘤学结果、术后并发症和病理结果。

结果

对50例70岁及以上患者实施了远端胃切除术,其中23例采用腹腔镜手术(LADG组),27例采用开放手术(ODG组)。LADG组的平均年龄为76.6岁,ODG组为80.0岁。两组在年龄、性别、BMI、ASA分级、既往手术史、CCI和病理特征方面的比较显示,结果在统计学上相似。LADG组的特点是术中失血量较少(LADG组为100 mL,ODG组为250 mL,P < 0.001),麻醉药物使用较少(LADG组为1天,ODG组为3天,P < 0.001),肠功能恢复较快(首次排气时间:LADG组为51.6小时,ODG组为67.2小时,P < 0.001;开始经口进食天数:LADG组为6.1天,ODG组为7.9天,P = 0.002),术后住院时间较短(LADG组为12天,ODG组为16天,P < 0.001)。接受LADG和ODG的患者在术后并发症发生率(总体并发症发生率:LADG组为21.7%,ODG组为25.9%,P = 0.730)、生存率(P = 0.719)、术后复发和转移率方面无显著差异。

结论

LADG治疗老年胃癌患者是可行、有效且安全的,在某些手术结果方面可能优于传统的开放切除术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验