Suppr超能文献

臂丛神经重建术后2年和11年的肩部及肘部恢复情况

Shoulder and Elbow Recovery at 2 and 11 Years Following Brachial Plexus Reconstruction.

作者信息

Wang Jung-Pan, Rancy Schneider K, Lee Steve K, Feinberg Joseph H, Wolfe Scott W

机构信息

Center for Brachial Plexus and Traumatic Nerve Injury, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Center for Brachial Plexus and Traumatic Nerve Injury, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Feb;41(2):173-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To report short-term and long-term outcomes on a single patient cohort observed longitudinally after nerve reconstruction for adult brachial plexus injury.

METHODS

Eleven male patients who underwent plexus reconstruction by the same surgeon at 2 institutions presented for clinical examination 7.5 or more years after surgery (average, 11.4 years; range, 7.5-22 years). Average age at the time of operation was 35 years (range, 17-73 years). Mean delay until surgery was 5 months (range, 2-11 months). Two patients had C5 paralysis, 2 had C5-C6 paralysis, 2 had C5-C7 paralysis, and 5 had complete 5-level injuries. Outcome parameters included active range of motion (ROM) in degrees, a modified British Medical Research Council (mBMRC) scale for muscle strength, and electromyographic motor unit configuration and recruitment pattern. Differences in ROM and mBMRC between 2-year and long-term follow-up were assessed with paired-sample t tests using an alpha value of .05.

RESULTS

Average shoulder abduction and mBMRC at final follow-up were both significantly improved compared with the 2-year follow-up results (P < .05). Average elbow flexion and mBMRC increased significantly between 2 years and final follow-up (P < .05). Electromyographic results for 6 patients at final follow-up showed improved motor unit configuration in 10 of 15 muscles and improved recruitment in 3 of 15 muscles compared with 2-year electromyographic results.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients continued to gain ROM and strength in the shoulder and elbow well after 2 to 3 years after surgery, contrary to previous reports. Although the precise mechanism is unknown, we speculate that a number of factors may be involved, including terminal collateral sprouting, maturation of motor units, improvements in motor unit recruitment, additional muscle fiber hypertrophy, or an as-yet undescribed mechanism. We recommend that patients be encouraged to continue strengthening exercises well after the initial recovery period and that more comparative long-term data be collected to expand on these observations.

摘要

目的

报告成年臂丛神经损伤神经重建后纵向观察的单一患者队列的短期和长期结果。

方法

11名男性患者在2家机构由同一位外科医生进行了神经丛重建,术后7.5年或更长时间接受临床检查(平均11.4年;范围7.5 - 22年)。手术时的平均年龄为35岁(范围17 - 73岁)。手术前的平均延迟时间为5个月(范围2 - 11个月)。2例患者为C5麻痹,2例为C5 - C6麻痹,2例为C5 - C7麻痹,5例为完全性5级损伤。结果参数包括以度数表示的主动活动范围(ROM)、改良的英国医学研究委员会(mBMRC)肌力分级以及肌电图运动单位形态和募集模式。使用α值为0.05的配对样本t检验评估2年和长期随访之间ROM和mBMRC的差异。

结果

与2年随访结果相比,最终随访时的平均肩外展和mBMRC均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。2年至最终随访期间,平均肘屈曲和mBMRC显著增加(P < 0.05)。与2年肌电图结果相比,6例患者最终随访时的肌电图结果显示,15块肌肉中有10块肌肉的运动单位形态改善,15块肌肉中有3块肌肉的募集改善。

结论

与先前报道相反,患者在术后2至3年之后,肩部和肘部的ROM和力量仍持续增加。尽管确切机制尚不清楚,但我们推测可能涉及多种因素,包括终末侧支发芽、运动单位成熟、运动单位募集改善、额外的肌纤维肥大或一种尚未描述的机制。我们建议鼓励患者在初始恢复期后继续进行强化锻炼,并收集更多比较性长期数据以扩展这些观察结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验