Bevilaqua-Grossi Débora, Gonçalves Maria Claudia, Carvalho Gabriela Ferreira, Florencio Lidiane Lima, Dach Fabíola, Speciali José Geraldo, Bigal Marcelo Eduardo, Chaves Thaís Cristina
Ribeirao Preto Medical School, Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Locomotor Aparattus Rehabilitation, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.
Physiotherapy School, University of Maranhao Center, Sao Luis, MA, Brazil.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6):866-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
To evaluate the additional effect provided by physical therapy in migraine treatment.
Randomized controlled trial.
Tertiary university-based hospital.
Among the 300 patients approached, 50 women (age range, 18-55y) diagnosed with migraine were randomized into 2 groups: a control group (n=25) and a physiotherapy plus medication group (n=25) (N=50).
Both groups received medication for migraine treatment. Additionally, physiotherapy plus medication patients received 8 sessions of physical therapy over 4 weeks, comprised mainly of manual therapy and stretching maneuvers lasting 50 minutes.
A blinded examiner assessed the clinical outcomes of headache frequency, intensity, and self-perception of global change and physical outcomes of pressure pain threshold and cervical range of motion. Data were recorded at baseline, posttreatment, and 1-month follow-up.
Twenty-three patients experienced side effects from the medication. Both groups reported a significantly reduced frequency of headaches; however, no differences were observed between groups (physiotherapy plus medication patients showed an additional 18% improvement at posttreatment and 12% improvement at follow-up compared with control patients, P>.05). The reduction observed in the physiotherapy plus medication patients was clinically relevant at posttreatment, whereas clinical relevance for control patients was demonstrated only at follow-up. For pain intensity, physiotherapy plus medication patients showed statistical evidence and clinical relevance with reduction posttreatment (P<.05). In addition, they showed better self-perception of global change than control patients (P<.05). The cervical muscle pressure pain threshold increased significantly in the physiotherapy plus medication patients and decreased in the control patients, but statistical differences between groups were observed only in the temporal area (P<.05). No differences were observed between groups regarding cervical range of motion.
We cannot assume that physical therapy promotes additional improvement in migraine treatment; however, it can increase the cervical pressure pain threshold, anticipate clinically relevant changes, and enhance patient satisfaction.
评估物理治疗在偏头痛治疗中所提供的额外效果。
随机对照试验。
以大学为基础的三级医院。
在300名接触的患者中,50名被诊断为偏头痛的女性(年龄范围18 - 55岁)被随机分为两组:对照组(n = 25)和物理治疗加药物治疗组(n = 25)(N = 50)。
两组均接受偏头痛治疗药物。此外,物理治疗加药物治疗组的患者在4周内接受8次物理治疗,主要包括手法治疗和持续50分钟的伸展动作。
一名盲法检查者评估头痛频率、强度、总体变化的自我感知等临床结局,以及压痛阈值和颈椎活动范围等身体指标。数据在基线、治疗后和1个月随访时记录。
23名患者出现药物副作用。两组均报告头痛频率显著降低;然而,两组之间未观察到差异(与对照组患者相比,物理治疗加药物治疗组患者在治疗后额外改善18%,随访时改善12%,P>0.05)。物理治疗加药物治疗组患者在治疗后观察到的减少具有临床相关性,而对照组患者仅在随访时显示出临床相关性。对于疼痛强度,物理治疗加药物治疗组患者在治疗后显示出统计学证据和临床相关性的降低(P<0.05)。此外,他们在总体变化的自我感知方面比对照组患者更好(P<0.05)。物理治疗加药物治疗组患者的颈部肌肉压痛阈值显著增加,而对照组患者则降低,但仅在颞部区域观察到组间统计学差异(P<0.05)。两组在颈椎活动范围方面未观察到差异。
我们不能认为物理治疗能促进偏头痛治疗的额外改善;然而,它可以提高颈部压痛阈值,预期临床相关变化,并提高患者满意度。