Ramanathan Suhashini, Solete Pradeep
Undergraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India, India, e-mail:
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Nov 1;16(11):869-72. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1773.
To evaluate the remaining dentin thickness of teeth after cleaning and shaping the root canal using three rotary instrumentation technique using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
This in vitro study is being done with 30 premolar samples with 20' curvature. The study is divided into three groups a CBCT was taken to measure the shortest distance from the root canal outline to the closest adjacent root surface was measured at each level from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) (1,3, 5 and 7 mm) before and after root canal instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of different instruments used to prepare curved root canals on the remaining cervical dentin thickness and total amount of dentin removed from root canals during instrumentation by using multi-slice CBCT. The remaining dentin thickness is very much necessary for the success rate of root canal treatment. However, this study helps to prove that a conservative preparation with a sound remaining dentin thickness is much more advisable.
It was observed that there was a significant difference at 1 and 3 mm (p < 0.05) and at 5 and 7 mm there was no significant difference ( p > 0.05). Mtwo has removed less amount dentin when compared to ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next system at 1 and 3 mm.
Under the conditions of the study, we concluded that ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next should be used judiciously, as it causes higher thinning of root dentin of the root when compared with Mtwo.
使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),评估三种旋转器械技术对根管进行清理和塑形后牙齿的剩余牙本质厚度。
本体外研究使用30个具有20°弯曲度的前磨牙样本。研究分为三组,在根管预备前后,从牙骨质釉质界(CEJ)(1、3、5和7毫米)的每个水平测量从根管轮廓到最邻近牙根表面的最短距离,通过多层CBCT进行测量。本研究的目的是比较使用不同器械预备弯曲根管对器械操作过程中根管剩余颈部牙本质厚度和从根管中去除的牙本质总量的影响。根管治疗的成功率非常需要剩余牙本质厚度。然而,本研究有助于证明,保留足够剩余牙本质厚度的保守预备更为可取。
观察到在1和3毫米处存在显著差异(p < 0.05),在5和7毫米处无显著差异(p > 0.05)。与ProTaper Universal和ProTaper Next系统相比,在1和3毫米处,Mtwo去除的牙本质量更少。
在本研究条件下,我们得出结论,ProTaper Universal和ProTaper Next应谨慎使用,因为与Mtwo相比,它们会导致牙根牙本质更严重的变薄。