Layfield L J, Glasgow B J, Cramer H
Pathol Annu. 1989;24 Pt 2:23-62.
The exact role of FNA in the diagnosis of palpable breast lesions is still uncertain. False-positive and false-negative cytological diagnoses occur and raise questions regarding the diagnostic utility of FNA as a replacement for open biopsy in many clinical situations. False-positive diagnoses may result from atypical epithelial proliferations, fibroadenomas, or inflammatory lesions. False-negative aspirates may occur because of technical errors, cystic lesions, and underdiagnosis of low grade neoplasms. The triple diagnosis protocol has been suggested as a replacement for open biopsy of palpable breast masses in many clinical situations. Following this algorithm, the results of palpation, mammography, and cytology are combined to guide management. Mammography should precede FNA or follow the cytologic procedure by 2 or more weeks. Patients with a positive triple diagnosis should undergo open biopsy or confirmatory intraoperative frozen section. Positive FNA results would be useful for preoperative counselling as well as serving as a diagnostic procedure for clinically suspicious lesions in patients wishing a confirmatory test before open biopsy is performed. Patients with discordant triplet results should be referred for open biopsy. The management of patients with negative triplet results is less clear. From the available data, it appears that approximately 2 percent of patients with negative triplet results have carcinoma. Based on these results, we cannot recommend replacing open biopsy by the triple diagnosis method in most patients with a persistent dominant mass. In most cases, a biopsy is indicated. Surgeons, who plan to follow a breast mass with clinical examination, may be able to reduce their false-negative rate by performing FNA. Further study is necessary to establish the best way to use FNA in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma, to determine the cost effectiveness of the triple diagnosis method as a substitute for open biopsy, and to assess the utility of aspiration cytology in the mammographically directed diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions.
细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNA)在可触及乳腺病变诊断中的确切作用仍不明确。细胞诊断存在假阳性和假阴性结果,这引发了关于FNA在许多临床情况下替代开放性活检的诊断效用的疑问。假阳性诊断可能源于非典型上皮增生、纤维腺瘤或炎性病变。假阴性抽吸可能由于技术错误、囊性病变以及低度肿瘤的诊断不足而发生。在许多临床情况下,三联诊断方案已被建议作为可触及乳腺肿块开放性活检的替代方法。按照此算法,结合触诊、乳腺X线摄影和细胞学检查结果来指导治疗。乳腺X线摄影应在FNA之前进行,或在细胞学检查后2周或更长时间进行。三联诊断呈阳性的患者应接受开放性活检或术中确诊性冰冻切片检查。FNA阳性结果对于术前咨询以及作为希望在进行开放性活检前进行确诊性检查的临床可疑病变的诊断程序很有用。三联诊断结果不一致的患者应转诊进行开放性活检。三联诊断结果为阴性的患者的管理尚不清楚。根据现有数据,似乎约2%三联诊断结果为阴性的患者患有癌症。基于这些结果,我们不建议在大多数有持续优势肿块的患者中用三联诊断方法替代开放性活检。在大多数情况下,需要进行活检。计划通过临床检查随访乳腺肿块的外科医生通过进行FNA可能能够降低其假阴性率。有必要进一步研究以确定在乳腺癌诊断中使用FNA的最佳方法,确定三联诊断方法替代开放性活检的成本效益,并评估抽吸细胞学在乳腺X线摄影引导下对不可触及乳腺病变诊断中的效用。