Wang Anqi, Welch Rene, Zhao Bo, Ta Tram, Keleş Sündüz, Johannsen Eric
Department of Medicine and Oncology, McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
J Virol. 2015 Dec 30;90(6):2906-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02737-15.
Latent infection of B lymphocytes by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in vitro results in their immortalization into lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs); this latency program is controlled by the EBNA2 viral transcriptional activator, which targets promoters via RBPJ, a DNA binding protein in the Notch signaling pathway. Three other EBNA3 proteins (EBNA3A, EBNA3B, and EBNA3C) interact with RBPJ to regulate cell gene expression. The mechanism by which EBNAs regulate different genes via RBPJ remains unclear. Our chromatin immunoprecipitation with deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis of the EBNA3 proteins analyzed in concert with prior EBNA2 and RBPJ data demonstrated that EBNA3A, EBNA3B, and EBNA3C bind to distinct, partially overlapping genomic locations. Although RBPJ interaction is critical for EBNA3A and EBNA3C growth effects, only 30 to 40% of EBNA3-bound sites colocalize with RBPJ. Using LCLs conditional for EBNA3A or EBNA3C activity, we demonstrate that EBNA2 binding at sites near EBNA3A- or EBNA3C-regulated genes is specifically regulated by the respective EBNA3. To investigate EBNA3 binding specificity, we identified sequences and transcription factors enriched at EBNA3A-, EBNA3B-, and EBNA3C-bound sites. This confirmed the prior observation that IRF4 is enriched at EBNA3A- and EBNA3C-bound sites and revealed IRF4 enrichment at EBNA3B-bound sites. Using IRF4-negative BJAB cells, we demonstrate that IRF4 is essential for EBNA3C, but not EBNA3A or EBNA3B, binding to specific sites. These results support a model in which EBNA2 and EBNA3s compete for distinct subsets of RBPJ sites to regulate cell genes and where EBNA3 subset specificity is determined by interactions with other cell transcription factors.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent gene products cause human cancers and transform B lymphocytes into immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines in vitro. EBV nuclear antigens (EBNAs) and membrane proteins constitutively activate pathways important for lymphocyte growth and survival. An important unresolved question is how four different EBNAs (EBNA2, -3A, -3B, and -3C) exert unique effects via a single transcription factor, RBPJ. Here, we report that each EBNA binds to distinct but partially overlapping sets of genomic sites. EBNA3A and EBNA3C specifically regulate EBNA2's access to different RBPJ sites, providing a mechanism by which each EBNA can regulate distinct cell genes. We show that IRF4, an essential regulator of B cell differentiation, is critical for EBNA3C binding specificity; EBNA3A and EBNA3B specificities are likely due to interactions with other cell transcription factors. EBNA3 titration of EBNA2 transcriptional function at distinct sites likely limits cell defenses that would be triggered by unchecked EBNA2 prooncogenic activity.
体外爱泼斯坦 - 巴尔病毒(EBV)对B淋巴细胞的潜伏感染导致其永生化成为淋巴母细胞系(LCLs);这种潜伏程序由EBNA2病毒转录激活因子控制,该因子通过Notch信号通路中的DNA结合蛋白RBPJ靶向启动子。其他三种EBNA3蛋白(EBNA3A、EBNA3B和EBNA3C)与RBPJ相互作用以调节细胞基因表达。EBNAs通过RBPJ调节不同基因的机制仍不清楚。我们对EBNA3蛋白进行染色质免疫沉淀结合深度测序(ChIP-seq)分析,并结合先前的EBNA2和RBPJ数据,结果表明EBNA3A、EBNA3B和EBNA3C结合到不同的、部分重叠的基因组位置。虽然RBPJ相互作用对EBNA3A和EBNA3C的生长效应至关重要,但只有30%至40%的EBNA3结合位点与RBPJ共定位。使用对EBNA3A或EBNA3C活性有条件的LCLs,我们证明EBNA2在EBNA3A或EBNA3C调节基因附近位点的结合受到相应EBNA3的特异性调节。为了研究EBNA3的结合特异性,我们鉴定了在EBNA3A、EBNA3B和EBNA3C结合位点富集的序列和转录因子。这证实了先前的观察结果,即IRF4在EBNA3A和EBNA3C结合位点富集,并揭示了IRF4在EBNA3B结合位点的富集。使用IRF4阴性的BJAB细胞,我们证明IRF4对于EBNA3C结合特定位点至关重要,但对EBNA3A或EBNA3B结合并非必需。这些结果支持了一个模型,其中EBNA2和EBNA3s竞争RBPJ位点的不同子集以调节细胞基因,并且EBNA3子集特异性由与其他细胞转录因子的相互作用决定。
爱泼斯坦 - 巴尔病毒(EBV)潜伏基因产物可导致人类癌症,并在体外将B淋巴细胞转化为永生化的淋巴母细胞系。EBV核抗原(EBNAs)和膜蛋白持续激活对淋巴细胞生长和存活重要的途径。一个重要的未解决问题是四种不同的EBNAs(EBNA