Suppr超能文献

胎心监护分析的电子学习培训项目评估:一项多中心随机研究。

Assessment of an e-learning training program for cardiotocography analysis: a multicentre randomized study.

作者信息

Carbonne Bruno, Sabri-Kaci Imène

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics - Maternité, Hôpital Trousseau, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monaco.

Ecole de Sages-Femmes Saint-Antoine, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6, France.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Feb;197:111-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the improvement of knowledge in cardiotocography (CTG) analysis, with the use of a dedicated e-learning program.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicentre randomized controlled trial conducted in 5 maternity departments of Eastern-Paris Perinatal network. Midwives and obstetricians were recruited on a voluntary basis. At first log-in, they were tested on CTG interpretation and on labor management. They were then randomly allocated to a "training" group (n=57) with the e-learning program, or to a "no-training" group (n=56). After three months, a second test was performed. Mean scores at first and second tests, rate of participants in the bottom quartile, and mean scores between doctors and midwives were compared between "training" and "no-training" groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-five midwives and 38 obstetricians participated in the study. The mean scores at first test were similar in both groups (32.4 ± 5.2 out of 50 and 32.5 ± 4.6, p=0.989). After e-learning, the results were significantly higher in the "training" group than in the "no-training" group (mean 37.1 ± 5.5 vs. 32.6 ± 5.7, respectively; p=0.0026). The number of participants in the bottom quartile reached 36.0% in the "no-training" group, while it decreased to 12.6% in the "training" group (p=0.032). Doctors had higher results than midwives in the first test (34.9 ± 5.9 vs. 32.4 ± 4.3; p=0.0048), but not in the second test in the group with training (37.7 ± 6.7 vs. 36.8 ± 4.8; p=0.64).

CONCLUSION

Training in CTG interpretation using an e-learning program improves the performance of obstetric staff. The possibility of logging-in from any place at any time may favor the use of an e-learning program in maternity staff.

摘要

目的

通过使用专门的电子学习程序,评估胎心监护(CTG)分析知识的提升情况。

研究设计

在东巴黎围产期网络的5个产科部门进行的多中心随机对照试验。助产士和产科医生自愿参与。首次登录时,对他们进行CTG解读和分娩管理方面的测试。然后将他们随机分为“培训”组(n = 57),使用电子学习程序,或“无培训”组(n = 56)。三个月后,进行第二次测试。比较“培训”组和“无培训”组首次和第二次测试的平均分数、处于最低四分位数的参与者比例以及医生和助产士之间的平均分数。

结果

75名助产士和38名产科医生参与了研究。两组首次测试的平均分数相似(满分50分,分别为32.4 ± 5.2和32.5 ± 4.6,p = 0.989)。经过电子学习后,“培训”组的结果显著高于“无培训”组(分别为平均37.1 ± 5.5和32.6 ± 5.7;p = 0.0026)。“无培训”组中处于最低四分位数的参与者比例达到36.0%,而“培训”组中这一比例降至12.6%(p = 0.032)。在首次测试中,医生的成绩高于助产士(34.9 ± 5.9对32.4 ± 4.3;p = 0.0048),但在培训组的第二次测试中并非如此(37.7 ± 6.7对36.8 ± 4.8;p = 0.64)。

结论

使用电子学习程序进行CTG解读培训可提高产科工作人员的表现。随时从任何地点登录的可能性可能有利于产科工作人员使用电子学习程序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验