Thellesen Line, Sorensen Jette L, Hedegaard Morten, Rosthoej Susanne, Colov Nina P, Andersen Kristine S, Bergholt Thomas
Department of Obstetrics, Juliane Marie Center for Children, Women and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Sep;96(9):1075-1083. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13171. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
We aimed to examine whether cardiotocography (CTG) knowledge, interpretation skills and decision-making measured by a written assessment were associated with size of maternity unit, years of obstetric work experience and healthcare professional background.
A national cross-sectional study in the setting of a CTG teaching intervention involving all 24 maternity units in Denmark. Participants were midwives (n = 1260) and specialists (n = 269) and residents (n = 142) in obstetrics and gynecology who attended a 1-day CTG course and answered a 30-item multiple-choice question test. Associations between mean test score and work conditions were analyzed using multivariable robust regression, in which the three variables were mutually adjusted.
Participants from units with > 3000 deliveries/year scored higher on the test than participants from units with < 1000 deliveries/year (3000-3999 deliveries/year: mean difference 0.8, p < 0.0001; > 4000 deliveries/year: mean difference 0.5, p = 0.006). Participants with < 15 years of work experience scored higher than participants with > 15 years of experience (15-20 years of experience: mean difference - 0.6, p = 0.007; > 20 years experience: mean difference - 0.9, p < 0.0001). No differences were detected concerning professional background.
CTG knowledge, interpretation skills and decision-making measured by a written assessment were positively associated with working in large maternity units and having < 15 years of obstetric work experience. This might indicate a challenge in maintaining CTG skills in small units and among experienced staff but could also reflect different levels of motivation, test familiarity and learning culture. Whether the findings are transferable to the clinical setting was not examined.
我们旨在研究通过书面评估衡量的胎心监护(CTG)知识、解读技能和决策能力是否与产科病房规模、产科工作年限以及医疗专业背景相关。
在丹麦所有24个产科病房开展的一项全国性横断面研究,该研究设置了CTG教学干预。参与者为参加了为期1天的CTG课程并回答了一份包含30道多项选择题测试的助产士(n = 1260)、妇产科专科医生(n = 269)和住院医师(n = 142)。使用多变量稳健回归分析平均测试分数与工作条件之间的关联,其中这三个变量相互调整。
来自年分娩量>3000例的病房的参与者在测试中的得分高于来自年分娩量<1000例的病房的参与者(年分娩量3000 - 3999例:平均差异0.8,p < 0.0001;年分娩量>4000例:平均差异0.5,p = 0.006)。工作经验<15年的参与者得分高于工作经验>15年的参与者(工作经验15 - 20年:平均差异 - 0.6,p = 0.007;工作经验>20年:平均差异 - 0.9,p < 0.0001)。在专业背景方面未检测到差异。
通过书面评估衡量的CTG知识、解读技能和决策能力与在大型产科病房工作以及产科工作经验<15年呈正相关。这可能表明在小型病房和经验丰富的员工中维持CTG技能存在挑战,但也可能反映出不同的积极性、对测试的熟悉程度和学习文化水平。这些发现是否可转化到临床环境中未作研究。