Suppr超能文献

上肋骨骨折及大血管损伤。

Fracture of the upper ribs and injury to the great vessels.

作者信息

Poole G V

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216.

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 Sep;169(3):275-82.

PMID:2672391
Abstract

Although individual reports have indicated that a fracture of the first or second rib is predictive of injury to the thoracic aorta and its major branches, the results of a careful review of the literature do not support this contention. In patients suffering blunt trauma, the risk of disruption of the aorta is not greater in patients with fracture of the upper two ribs, compared with victims of trauma with fracture of other ribs or those without fracture of ribs. Clinical manifestations are often absent in patients with disruption of the aorta or the innominate artery, but evidence of mediastinal hemorrhage is almost always present on roentgenograms of the chest. Widening of the mediastinum may not be apparent, but obliteration of the normal aortic contour is a sensitive finding in aortic transection. Injury to the subclavian or carotid artery nearly always produces clinical or roentgenographic signs, or both. After blunt trauma to the chest, patients with fracture of the first or second rib without clinical signs of vascular injury and evidence of mediastinal hemorrhage on thoracic roentgenograms (with the patient in an upright position when possible) do not need aortography to exclude occult vascular injury. A few patients with injury to the great vessels may have a normal thoracic roentgenogram on initial presentation to the hospital. After the correction of hypovolemia and stabilization of hemodynamic status, evidence of mediastinal bleeding should become apparent on subsequent thoracic roentgenograms. Repeat examinations must be performed and serial roentgenograms of the chest must be obtained for several days after injury to assess the possibility of unrecognized vascular trauma. If clinical or roentgenographic evidence of vascular injury is revealed, arteriography is mandatory. Thoracic CT scanning in patients with evidence of mediastinal hemorrhage on plain film may be of value in selecting patients for angiography, but additional experience must be obtained before such a protocol becomes an established policy.

摘要

尽管个别报告指出,第一或第二肋骨骨折可预示胸主动脉及其主要分支损伤,但对文献的仔细回顾结果并不支持这一观点。在钝性创伤患者中,与其他肋骨骨折或无肋骨骨折的创伤受害者相比,上两根肋骨骨折患者的主动脉破裂风险并不更高。主动脉或无名动脉破裂的患者通常没有临床表现,但胸部X线片上几乎总会出现纵隔出血的迹象。纵隔增宽可能不明显,但正常主动脉轮廓消失是主动脉横断的一个敏感表现。锁骨下动脉或颈动脉损伤几乎总会产生临床或X线征象,或两者皆有。胸部钝性创伤后,第一或第二肋骨骨折且无血管损伤临床体征、胸部X线片(尽可能让患者处于直立位)无纵隔出血迹象的患者,无需进行主动脉造影以排除隐匿性血管损伤。少数大血管损伤患者入院初诊时胸部X线片可能正常。纠正低血容量和稳定血流动力学状态后,后续胸部X线片上应能明显看出纵隔出血迹象。受伤后数天必须进行重复检查并获取胸部系列X线片,以评估未被识别的血管创伤的可能性。如果发现血管损伤的临床或X线证据,则必须进行动脉造影。对于平片有纵隔出血证据的患者,胸部CT扫描在选择血管造影患者方面可能有价值,但在该方案成为既定政策之前,还必须积累更多经验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验