Suppr超能文献

奥马亚贮液器在脑室出血管理中的应用。

Application of the Ommaya Reservoir in Managing Ventricular Hemorrhage.

作者信息

Yang Xi-Tao, Feng Dong-Fu, Zhao Liang, Sun Zhao-Liang, Zhao Gang

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, No. 9 People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Emergency Department and Trauma Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.040. Epub 2015 Dec 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combined treatment of an Ommaya reservoir and conventional external ventricular drainage (EVD) using urokinase in the management of IVH.

METHODS

We performed a prospective controlled study. Sixty eligible patients with IVH received conventional EVD alone (group A) or combined EVD and Ommaya reservoir (group B) between January 2010 and January 2015. Clinical, cerebrospinal fluid, and radiographic data were used to assess clot clearance, clinical outcomes, and complications between the groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in gender, age, blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, Graeb score, intracerebral hemorrhage volume on admission, and IVH volume before surgery between groups A and B (P > 0.05). The number of injections of urokinase (20,000 IU/dose) were significantly different in group B compared with group A (P < 0.05). Repeated computed tomography scans 3 days, 6 days, and 10 days after surgery revealed that clot clearance rates at each time point were significantly increased in group B compared with group A (P < 0.05). The conventional catheter-based EVD duration time was shortened to 5 (4-6) days in group B compared with 7 (5-9) days in group A (P < 0.05). The total drainage time was prolonged to 9 (8-11) days in group B compared with 7 (5-9) days in group A (P < 0.05). Ventriculitis was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The hydrocephalus incidence and mortality revealed significant differences between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). The 30-day Glasgow Outcome Scale score was significantly increased in group B compared with group A (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined treatment approach of an Ommaya reservoir and EVD with intraventricular urokinase is safe and effective in patients with IVH. It increased clot clearance, shortened conventional catheter-based EVD duration, prolonged total drainage time, reduced the hydrocephalus incidence and mortality, and contributed to good clinical outcomes. The Ommaya reservoir provides a safe way to increase the injection times of urokinase, which accelerated clot resolution and did not increase the risk for ventriculitis infection.

摘要

背景

脑室内出血(IVH)与高发病率和死亡率相关。本研究评估了使用尿激酶的Ommaya储液器与传统外部脑室引流(EVD)联合治疗IVH的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性对照研究。2010年1月至2015年1月期间,60例符合条件的IVH患者单独接受传统EVD(A组)或联合EVD和Ommaya储液器(B组)治疗。使用临床、脑脊液和影像学数据评估两组之间的血凝块清除情况、临床结局和并发症。

结果

A组和B组在性别、年龄、血压、格拉斯哥昏迷量表、Graeb评分、入院时脑出血量和术前IVH量方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。B组与A组相比,尿激酶(20,000 IU/剂量)的注射次数有显著差异(P<0.05)。术后3天、6天和10天的重复计算机断层扫描显示,B组在每个时间点的血凝块清除率均显著高于A组(P<0.05)。B组基于传统导管的EVD持续时间缩短至5(4-6)天,而A组为7(5-9)天(P<0.05)。B组的总引流时间延长至9(8-11)天,而A组为7(5-9)天(P<0.05)。两组之间的脑室炎无显著差异(P>0.05)。脑积水发病率和死亡率在两组之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。B组的30天格拉斯哥预后量表评分显著高于A组(P<0.05)。

结论

对于IVH患者,Ommaya储液器与EVD联合脑室内注射尿激酶的治疗方法是安全有效的。它提高了血凝块清除率,缩短了基于传统导管的EVD持续时间,延长了总引流时间,降低了脑积水发病率和死亡率,并有助于获得良好的临床结局。Ommaya储液器提供了一种安全的方法来增加尿激酶的注射次数,加速了血凝块溶解,且未增加脑室炎感染风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验