Suppr超能文献

不同类型的粘结剂对后牙采用羽状边缘预备设计的整体式二硅酸锂全冠的影响。

Effect of different cement types on monolithic lithium disilicate complete crowns with feather-edge preparation design in the posterior region.

作者信息

Schmitz Johannes H, Beani Massimiliano

机构信息

Private practice, Milan, Italy.

Private practice, Aiello, Italy.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jun;115(6):678-83. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Dec 24.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Ideally, tooth preparation for complete crowns should require the removal of the smallest amount possible of sound tooth structure to maximize the strength of the remaining tooth. Some preparation designs, such as the feather-edge margin, are less invasive. However, limited data are available regarding monolithic lithium disilicate crowns for molars and premolars with this type of margin geometry.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and survival of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns in the posterior region fabricated with feather-edge margins and cemented either with conventional (glass ionomer) or resin self-etching cement in 2 private practices.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 257 monolithic lithium disilicate restorations on posterior teeth (108 premolars, 149 molars) were placed in 158 patients. All teeth were prepared with feather-edge margins and restored with single crowns. The modified California Dental Association (CDA) criteria were used to clinically evaluate participants recalled between June and December 2014.

RESULTS

The mean ±standard deviation follow-up time was 24 (±13.6; range: 6-75) months. Three crowns were replaced during the follow-up period because of the bulk fracture of the material (98.83% survival rate). No other technical or biological failure was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective evaluation, monolithic lithium disilicate crowns with feather-edge margins yielded clinical outcomes similar to those reported with other margin designs and materials.

摘要

问题陈述

理想情况下,全冠修复的牙体预备应尽可能去除最少的健康牙体组织,以最大化剩余牙齿的强度。一些预备设计,如羽状边缘,侵入性较小。然而,关于采用这种边缘几何形状的磨牙和前磨牙的整体式二硅酸锂全冠的数据有限。

目的

本回顾性研究的目的是评估在两家私人诊所中,采用羽状边缘制作并使用传统(玻璃离子体)或树脂自酸蚀粘结剂粘结的后牙整体式二硅酸锂全冠的临床效果和存留率。

材料与方法

共为158例患者的后牙(108颗前磨牙,149颗磨牙)制作了257个整体式二硅酸锂修复体。所有牙齿均采用羽状边缘进行预备,并制作单冠修复。采用改良的加利福尼亚牙科协会(CDA)标准对2014年6月至12月召回的参与者进行临床评估。

结果

平均随访时间±标准差为24(±13.6;范围:6 - 75)个月。随访期间有3个全冠因材料大块折断而更换(存留率为98.83%)。未观察到其他技术或生物学失败情况。

结论

在本次回顾性评估中,具有羽状边缘的整体式二硅酸锂全冠产生的临床效果与其他边缘设计和材料所报告的效果相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验