• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工耳蜗植入者波斯语元音的声学分析:与使用助听器的听力受损儿童及听力正常儿童的比较

Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.

作者信息

Jafari Narges, Yadegari Fariba, Jalaie Shohreh

机构信息

Department of Speech Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Speech Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):763.e1-763.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.006
PMID:26725549
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Vowel production in essence is auditorily controlled; hence, the role of the auditory feedback in vowel production is very important. The purpose of this study was to compare formant frequencies and vowel space in Persian-speaking deaf children with cochlear implantation (CI), hearing-impaired children with hearing aid (HA), and their normal-hearing (NH) peers.

METHODS

A total of 40 prelingually children with hearing impairment and 20 NH groups participated in this study. Participants were native Persian speakers. The average of first formant frequency (F) and second formant frequency (F) of the six vowels were measured using Praat software (version 5.1.44). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the differences between the three3 groups.

RESULTS

The mean value of F for vowel /i/ was significantly different (between CI and NH children and also between HA and NH groups) (F = 9.229, P < 0.001). For vowel /a/, the mean value of F was significantly different (between HA and NH groups) (F = 3.707, P < 0.05). Regarding the second formant frequency, a post hoc Tukey test revealed that the differences were between HA and NH children (P < 0.05). F for vowel /o/ was significantly different (F = 4.572, P < 0.05). Also, the mean value of F for vowel /a/ was significantly different (F = 3.184, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

About 1 year after implantation, the formants shift closer to those of the NH listeners who tend to have more expanded vowel spaces than hearing-impaired listeners with hearing aids. Probably, this condition is because CI has a subtly positive impact on the place of articulation of vowels.

摘要

目的

元音发音本质上受听觉控制;因此,听觉反馈在元音发音中起着非常重要的作用。本研究的目的是比较接受人工耳蜗植入(CI)的波斯语聋儿、佩戴助听器(HA)的听力受损儿童以及他们的正常听力(NH)同龄人之间的共振峰频率和元音空间。

方法

共有40名语前听力受损儿童和20名NH组儿童参与了本研究。参与者均为以波斯语为母语者。使用Praat软件(版本5.1.44)测量六个元音的第一共振峰频率(F)和第二共振峰频率(F)的平均值。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)来分析三组之间的差异。

结果

元音/i/的F平均值存在显著差异(在CI儿童与NH儿童之间以及HA儿童与NH组之间)(F = 9.229,P < 0.001)。对于元音/a/,F平均值存在显著差异(在HA儿童与NH组之间)(F = 3.707,P < 0.05)。关于第二共振峰频率,事后Tukey检验显示差异存在于HA儿童与NH儿童之间(P < 0.05)。元音/o/的F存在显著差异(F = 4.572,P < 0.05)。此外,元音/a/的F平均值也存在显著差异(F = 3.184,P < 0.05)。

结论

植入后约1年,共振峰向NH听众的共振峰偏移,NH听众的元音空间往往比佩戴助听器的听力受损听众更宽。可能,这种情况是因为人工耳蜗对元音的发音位置有微妙的积极影响。

相似文献

1
Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.人工耳蜗植入者波斯语元音的声学分析:与使用助听器的听力受损儿童及听力正常儿童的比较
J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):763.e1-763.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
2
A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children.使用人工耳蜗的听力受损儿童与听力正常儿童的波斯语元音发音比较
J Voice. 2016 May;30(3):340-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 May 16.
3
Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.人工耳蜗植入儿童嗓音的声学、空气动力学和感知分析。
J Voice. 2013 Jul;27(4):523.e1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.03.005.
4
The Acoustic Characteristics of the Voice in Cochlear-Implanted Children: A Longitudinal Study.人工耳蜗植入儿童的嗓音声学特征:一项纵向研究。
J Voice. 2017 Nov;31(6):773.e21-773.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
5
Vowel production in hearing impaired children: A comparison between normal-hearing, hearing-aided and cochlear-implanted children.听力受损儿童的元音发音:正常听力、佩戴助听器和接受人工耳蜗植入儿童的比较。
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Sep-Oct;70(5):251-257. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
6
Objective Voice Analysis of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients and Comparison With Hearing Aids Users and Hearing Controls.小儿人工耳蜗植入受者的客观语音分析及与助听器使用者和听力正常对照者的比较。
J Voice. 2017 Jul;31(4):505.e11-505.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
7
A Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) Voice Analysis in Iranian Post-lingual Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Users.伊朗语后天聋成年人工耳蜗使用者的声道倒谱峰值(CPP)语音分析。
J Voice. 2024 May;38(3):795.e11-795.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.10.021. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
Investigating interaural frequency-place mismatches via bimodal vowel integration.通过双模态元音整合研究两耳频率-位置失配。
Trends Hear. 2014 Nov 23;18:2331216514560590. doi: 10.1177/2331216514560590.
9
Vowel Production in Prelingually Deafened Mandarin-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants.人工耳蜗植入术后的语前聋说普通话儿童的元音发音
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Feb 17;64(2):664-682. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00469. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
10
Hearing impairment and vowel production. A comparison between normally hearing, hearing-aided and cochlear implanted Dutch children.听力障碍与元音发音。正常听力、佩戴助听器和接受人工耳蜗植入的荷兰儿童之间的比较。
J Commun Disord. 2016 Jan-Feb;59:24-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children.美国人工耳蜗植入联盟儿童人工耳蜗植入候选者评估指南
Ear Hear. 2022 Mar/Apr;43(2):268-282. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001087.