Suppr超能文献

急诊医疗服务使用及院间转运对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时间的影响:一项多中心观察性研究

Effect of Emergency Medical Service Use and Inter-hospital Transfer on Time to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter Observational Study.

作者信息

Choi Sae Won, Shin Sang Do, Ro Young Sun, Song Kyoung Jun, Lee Yu Jin, Lee Eui Jung

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(1):66-75. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1056892.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) recommends that patients be transported by emergency medical services (EMS) directly to a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-capable hospital. We examined the effects of EMS use according to inter-hospital transfer on time to PCI in STEMI patients.

METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with STEMI from November 2007 to December 2012 with symptom onset less than 24 hours treated with primary PCI at 29 emergency departments (ED) were included. Patients with unknown information about important time variables, inter-hospital transfer and EMS use, and patients who already received PCI at another hospital were excluded. Patients were divided into groups according to EMS use and inter-hospital transfer: Group A (direct to final ED by EMS), Group B (transferred to final ED after EMS transport), Group C (direct to final ED not by EMS), and Group D (transferred to final ED after non-EMS transport). Symptom to balloon time less than 120 minutes was considered timely PCI. Multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for potential risk factors examined the relationship between the groups and timely PCI. Interactions between EMS use and inter-hospital transfer were also tested for the outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 5826 patients were analyzed in this study, of which 28.3% called for EMS and 50% were transferred to another hospital for PCI. Median symptom to balloon time was 216 minutes. Timely PCI was achieved in 20.3% of the patients. With the Group D as the reference, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for timely PCI was 5.78 (4.81-6.95) for Group A, 0.80 (0.53-1.20) for Group B, and 2.87 (2.39-3.44) for Group C. In the interaction model, the AOR (95% CI) of EMS use in nontransferred groups and transferred groups was 2.01(1.71-2.38) and 0.80(0.53-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

EMS use significantly increased the odds of timely primary PCI to patients directly transported to a primary PCI center, but not in patients transferred from another hospital. EMS systems that identify STEMI patients and transport them to PCI capable hospitals, and processes to expedite the transfer of patients between non-PCI and PCI hospitals need to be developed further.

摘要

背景

2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会(ACCF/AHA)ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)管理指南建议,患者应由紧急医疗服务(EMS)直接转运至具备经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)能力的医院。我们研究了院间转运时使用EMS对STEMI患者进行PCI治疗时间的影响。

方法

纳入2007年11月至2012年12月在29个急诊科(ED)接受直接PCI治疗、症状发作时间少于24小时的成年STEMI患者。排除重要时间变量、院间转运和EMS使用情况信息不明的患者,以及已在其他医院接受过PCI治疗的患者。根据EMS使用情况和院间转运情况将患者分为四组:A组(由EMS直接转运至最终就诊的ED)、B组(经EMS转运后再转运至最终就诊的ED)、C组(非由EMS直接转运至最终就诊的ED)、D组(经非EMS转运后再转运至最终就诊的ED)。症状发作至球囊扩张时间少于120分钟被视为及时进行PCI治疗。采用多变量逻辑回归模型对潜在风险因素进行校正,以检验各组与及时PCI治疗之间的关系。还对EMS使用情况和院间转运之间的相互作用对结果的影响进行了检验。

结果

本研究共分析了5826例患者,其中28.3%呼叫了EMS,50%被转运至其他医院进行PCI治疗。症状发作至球囊扩张时间的中位数为216分钟。20.3%的患者实现了及时PCI治疗。以D组为参照,A组及时PCI治疗的校正比值比(AOR)及95%置信区间(95%CI)为5.78(4.81 - 6.95),B组为0.80(0.53 - 1.20),C组为2.87(2.39 - 3.44)。在相互作用模型中,未转运组和转运组使用EMS的AOR(95%CI)分别为2.01(1.71 - 2.38)和0.80(0.53 - 1.20)。

结论

使用EMS显著增加了直接转运至初级PCI中心患者及时进行直接PCI治疗的几率,但对于从其他医院转运来的患者则不然。需要进一步建立能够识别STEMI患者并将其转运至具备PCI治疗能力医院的EMS系统,以及加快非PCI医院与PCI医院之间患者转运的流程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验