• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术对老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者来说是一种安全的治疗方法吗?

Is transcatheter aortic valve replacement a safe treatment for elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis?

作者信息

Mohammadi Mina, Hill Catherine, Chaney Susan

机构信息

College of Nursing, Texas Woman's University, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2016 Jul;28(7):387-92. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12338. Epub 2016 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1002/2327-6924.12338
PMID:26728319
Abstract

PURPOSE

This article's purpose is to make advanced practice nurses (APNs) aware of a minimally invasive transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for treating symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis in elderly patients. These patients are not safe surgical candidates because of their age and prohibitive risk profile, but they can benefit from valve replacement.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was completed by searching online databases such as CINAHL, PubMed, and Google. Research articles from 2008 to 2014 were retrieved from various medical journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, and New England Journal of Medicine. Key words used in the search were aortic valve replacement, elderly patients, and severe aortic stenosis (AS).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive TAVR is highly superior to the medical treatment including aortic valvuloplasty and is noninferior to the surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis in elderly patients who are not safe surgical candidates.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

APNs have the education and skills to diagnose AS. Hence, they should stay abreast of new treatments and provide safe care and referrals for their patients diagnosed with severe AS.

摘要

目的

本文旨在让高级执业护士(APN)了解一种用于治疗老年患者症状性严重主动脉瓣狭窄的微创经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)。由于年龄和极高的风险状况,这些患者并非手术的安全候选人,但他们可从瓣膜置换中获益。

方法

通过检索CINAHL、PubMed和谷歌等在线数据库完成系统的文献综述。从《美国心脏病学杂志》《耶鲁生物学与医学杂志》《美国医学会杂志》和《新英格兰医学杂志》等各种医学期刊中检索2008年至2014年的研究文章。检索中使用的关键词为主动脉瓣置换、老年患者和严重主动脉狭窄(AS)。

结论

对于并非手术安全候选人的老年患者,在治疗症状性严重主动脉瓣狭窄方面,微创TAVR远优于包括主动脉瓣成形术在内的药物治疗,且不劣于外科主动脉瓣置换术。

对实践的启示

APN具备诊断AS的知识和技能。因此,他们应跟上新的治疗方法,并为诊断为严重AS的患者提供安全的护理和转诊服务。

相似文献

1
Is transcatheter aortic valve replacement a safe treatment for elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis?经导管主动脉瓣置换术对老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者来说是一种安全的治疗方法吗?
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2016 Jul;28(7):387-92. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12338. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
2
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.低至中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术纵向比较的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in high surgical risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危外科手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196877. eCollection 2018.
4
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
5
[Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review of the literature on efficacy and safety data].经导管主动脉瓣植入术:关于疗效和安全性数据的文献系统评价
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Jan;107(1):25-38. doi: 10.1701/2132.23102.
6
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: An Update.经导管主动脉瓣置换术相关急性肾损伤:最新进展。
Cardiorenal Med. 2023;13(1):143-157. doi: 10.1159/000529729. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
7
SAPIEN 3 versus Myval transcatheter heart valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (COMPARE-TAVI 1): a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial.经导管主动脉瓣植入术使用SAPIEN 3与Myval经导管心脏瓣膜对比研究(COMPARE-TAVI 1):一项多中心、随机、非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2025 Apr 19;405(10487):1362-1372. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00106-0. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
8
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated with Comparable Clinical Outcomes to Open Aortic Valve Surgery but with a Reduced Length of In-Patient Hospital Stay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与开放性主动脉瓣手术的临床结局相当,但住院时间缩短:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Mar;26(3):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
9
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing 3 Aortic Valve Interventions: The THIRD Multicenter Registry.接受3种主动脉瓣干预治疗患者的临床特征与结局:THIRD多中心注册研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan 13;18(1):103-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.037.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.