Chapman W C, Stephens W H, Williams L F
Center for Gallstone Therapy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Am J Surg. 1989 Sep;158(3):179-83. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90247-x.
After recent reports of the successful use of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for the treatment of gallstone disease, at least 10 different manufacturers have developed lithotripsy systems and initiated clinical trials in the United States. The three major types of lithotripters, classified by the method used to generate shock waves, are the spark-gap, piezoelectric, and electromagnetic systems. Although each type of system generates shock waves by different methods, all currently available systems appear to be able to fragment gallstones. However, there does not appear to be any system that has demonstrated clear clinical superiority in terms of either efficacy or safety. Additional information, both clinical and experimental, is needed before it can be determined if the type of shock-wave generator has a significant effect on outcome. Clearly more than the physical principles of shock-wave lithotripters must be evaluated.
在近期有关于体外冲击波碎石术成功用于治疗胆结石疾病的报道之后,至少有10家不同的制造商已研发出碎石系统,并在美国启动了临床试验。根据产生冲击波所采用的方法分类,三种主要类型的碎石机分别是火花隙式、压电式和电磁式系统。尽管每种系统通过不同方法产生冲击波,但目前所有可用系统似乎都能够破碎胆结石。然而,似乎没有任何一种系统在疗效或安全性方面表现出明显的临床优势。在确定冲击波发生器的类型是否对治疗结果有显著影响之前,还需要更多临床和实验方面的信息。显然,需要评估的不仅仅是冲击波碎石机的物理原理。