• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿立哌唑每月一次治疗英国精神分裂症的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Aripiprazole Once-Monthly for the Treatment of Schizophrenia in the UK.

作者信息

Tempest Michael, Sapin Christophe, Beillat Maud, Robinson Paul, Treur Maarten

机构信息

Pharmerit International, Marten Meesweg 107., 3068 AV Rotterdam, Netherlands,

出版信息

J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Dec;18(4):185-200.

PMID:26729007
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is a severe and debilitating psychiatric disorder. Pharmacological interventions aim to ameliorate symptoms and reduce the risk of relapse and costly hospitalisation. Despite the established efficacy of antipsychotic medication, compliance to treatment is poor, particularly with oral formulation. The emergence of long acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic formulations in recent years has aimed to counteract the poor compliance rates observed and optimise long term patient outcomes.

AIMS OF THE STUDY

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg (AOM 400) vs. risperidone long acting injectable (RLAI), paliperidone long acting injectable (PLAI) and olanzapine long acting injectable (OLAI) in the maintenance treatment of chronic, stable schizophrenia patients in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to emulate the treatment pathway of a hypothetical cohort of patients initiating maintenance treatment with LAI antipsychotics. The economic analysis was conducted from a National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspective over a 10 year time horizon. Efficacy and safety probabilities were derived from mixed treatment comparisons (MTCs) where possible. Analyses were conducted assuming pooled dosing from randomised clinical trials included in the MTCs.

RESULTS

The model estimates that AOM 400 improves clinical outcomes by reducing relapses per patient comparative to other LAIs over the model time horizon (2.38, 2.53, 2.70, and 2.67 for AOM 400, RLAI, PLAI and OLAI respectively). In the deterministic analysis, AOM 400 dominated PLAI and OLAI; an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of GBP 3,686 per QALY gained was observed against RLAI. Results from the univariate sensitivity analyses highlighted the probability and cost of relapse as main drivers for cost-effectiveness. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, AOM 400 demonstrated a marginally higher probability of being cost-effective (51%) than RLAI, PLAI and OLAI (48%, 1% and 0%, respectively) at a willingness to pay threshold of GBP 20,000.

DISCUSSION

The model was built to accommodate results of an adjusted MTC analysis. Furthermore the model effectively captures repercussions of deteriorating compliance to treatment by incorporating three levels of compliance with elevated risks of relapse for partial compliance and non-compliance. Limitations of the analysis include the limited number of studies incorporated in the MTC, the extrapolation of short term clinical data and the exclusion of the wider societal burden.

IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE

Comparative to other atypical antipsychotics, AOM 400 represents value for money in the maintenance treatment of chronic, stable schizophrenia; however, in light of the PSA findings and comparable cost-effectiveness (i.e. against RLAI), the product profile and wider benefits of the respective treatments must be taken into account when prescribing antipsychotics.

IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Future research should assess the use of LAI antipsychotics earlier in the disease course of schizophrenia to see whether improved compliance and outcomes shortly following the onset of psychosis has the potential to alter the disease trajectory. Moreover it should be assessed whether changes in the disease trajectory can alleviate cost and resource pressures placed on national health services.

摘要

背景

精神分裂症是一种严重且使人衰弱的精神疾病。药物干预旨在改善症状,降低复发风险以及昂贵的住院费用。尽管抗精神病药物已证实有效,但治疗依从性较差,尤其是口服制剂。近年来长效注射(LAI)抗精神病制剂的出现旨在应对观察到的低依从率,并优化患者长期治疗效果。

研究目的

评估在英国慢性稳定型精神分裂症患者维持治疗中,阿立哌唑每月一次400mg(AOM 400)与利培酮长效注射剂(RLAI)、帕利哌酮长效注射剂(PLAI)及奥氮平长效注射剂(OLAI)相比的成本效益。

方法

建立马尔可夫模型以模拟一组开始使用LAI抗精神病药物进行维持治疗的假设患者的治疗路径。从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)和个人社会服务(PSS)的角度,在10年时间范围内进行经济分析。疗效和安全性概率尽可能从混合治疗比较(MTC)中得出。分析假设采用MTC中纳入的随机临床试验的合并剂量。

结果

模型估计,在模型时间范围内,与其他长效注射剂相比,AOM 400通过降低每位患者的复发率改善了临床结局(AOM 400、RLAI、PLAI和OLAI的复发率分别为2.38、2.53、2.70和2.67)。在确定性分析中,AOM 400优于PLAI和OLAI;与RLAI相比,每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比(ICER)为3686英镑。单因素敏感性分析结果突出了复发概率和成本是成本效益的主要驱动因素。在概率敏感性分析中,在支付意愿阈值为20000英镑时,AOM 400具有成本效益的概率(51%)略高于RLAI、PLAI和OLAI(分别为48%、1%和0%)。

讨论

该模型旨在纳入调整后的MTC分析结果。此外,该模型通过纳入三个依从性水平,有效捕捉了治疗依从性下降的影响,部分依从和不依从会增加复发风险。分析的局限性包括MTC中纳入的研究数量有限、短期临床数据的外推以及未考虑更广泛的社会负担。

对医疗保健提供和使用的启示

与其他非典型抗精神病药物相比,AOM 400在慢性稳定型精神分裂症的维持治疗中具有性价比;然而,鉴于PSA研究结果和相当的成本效益(即与RLAI相比),在开具抗精神病药物处方时,必须考虑各自治疗的产品特点和更广泛的益处。

对进一步研究的启示

未来研究应评估在精神分裂症病程早期使用LAI抗精神病药物,以确定精神病发作后不久改善依从性和治疗效果是否有可能改变疾病轨迹。此外,应评估疾病轨迹的变化是否可以减轻国家医疗服务体系的成本和资源压力。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Aripiprazole Once-Monthly for the Treatment of Schizophrenia in the UK.阿立哌唑每月一次治疗英国精神分裂症的成本效益分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Dec;18(4):185-200.
2
[Comparison of medical and economic benefits of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia in France].[法国抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的医学与经济效益比较]
Encephale. 2017 Aug;43(4):311-320. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
3
Cost Effectiveness of Paliperidone Long-Acting Injectable Versus Other Antipsychotics for the Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia in France.在法国,帕利哌酮长效注射剂与其他抗精神病药物用于精神分裂症维持治疗的成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Apr;34(4):363-91. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0348-x.
4
Cost effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate versus risperidone long-acting injectable and olanzapine pamoate for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia in Sweden.在瑞典,治疗精神分裂症患者时,棕榈酸帕利哌酮相较于利培酮长效注射剂和奥氮平癸酸酯的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(5):844-61. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.681531. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
5
Cost effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate for the treatment of schizophrenia in Germany.在德国,棕榈酸帕利哌酮治疗精神分裂症的成本效益
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Oct;11(5):509-21. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0050-0.
6
Cost-effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly compared with paliperidone palmitate once-monthly injectable for the treatment of schizophrenia in the United States.阿立哌唑一月注射一次与棕榈酸帕利哌酮一月注射一次治疗美国精神分裂症的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2014 Aug;17(8):567-76. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.917089. Epub 2014 May 12.
7
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of schizophrenic patient care settings: impact of an atypical antipsychotic under long-acting injection formulation].[精神分裂症患者护理环境的成本效益分析:长效注射制剂下非典型抗精神病药物的影响]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):235-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82390-5.
8
Cost-effectiveness of long-acting injectable aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg in bipolar I disorder in the USA.美国双相 I 型障碍中每月一次注射 400mg 长效阿立哌唑的成本效益分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Jul;7(7):637-650. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0010. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
9
Treatment Patterns, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Spending in Medicaid Beneficiaries Initiating Second-generation Long-acting Injectable Agents Versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics.启动第二代长效注射剂与口服非典型抗精神病药物的医疗补助受益人的治疗模式、医疗资源利用及支出情况
Clin Ther. 2017 Oct;39(10):1972-1985.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
Pharmacoeconomics of long-acting atypical antipsychotics for acutely relapsed chronic schizophrenia in Finland.长效非典型抗精神病药物治疗芬兰急性复发慢性精神分裂症的药物经济学
J Med Econ. 2016;19(2):111-20. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1100115. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Influencing factors of medication adherence in schizophrenic patients: a meta-analysis.精神分裂症患者药物依从性的影响因素:一项荟萃分析。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 May 15;9(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00356-x.
2
A Systematic Review of Methods and Study Quality of Economic Evaluations for the Treatment of Schizophrenia.精神分裂症治疗经济评估方法与研究质量的系统评价
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;9:689123. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.689123. eCollection 2021.
3
Systematic review of the methods of health economic models assessing antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia.
系统评价抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的健康经济模型方法。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 10;15(7):e0234996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234996. eCollection 2020.
4
Head-to-head comparison of 1-year aripiprazole long-acting injectable (LAI) versus paliperidone LAI in comorbid psychosis and substance use disorder: impact on clinical status, substance craving, and quality of life.阿立哌唑长效注射剂(LAI)与帕利哌酮LAI治疗合并精神病和物质使用障碍的1年疗效对比:对临床状态、物质渴望及生活质量的影响
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Jun 21;14:1645-1656. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S171002. eCollection 2018.