Liberati Elisa Giulia, Gorli Mara, Scaratti Giuseppe
Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123, Milan, Italy.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;150:31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
Delivery of interdisciplinary integrated care is central to contemporary health policy. Hospitals worldwide are therefore attempting to move away from a functional organisation of care, built around discipline-based specialisation, towards an approach of delivering care through multidisciplinary teams. However, the mere existence of such teams may not guarantee integrated and collaborative work across medical disciplines, which can be hindered by boundaries between and within professions. This paper analyses the boundaries that affect collaboration and care integration in newly created multidisciplinary teams. Empirical data are drawn from an ethnographic research conducted in the sub-intensive stroke unit of an Italian public hospital. Data collection involved 180 h of observations and conversations with 42 healthcare providers. Findings show that disciplinary boundaries hinder both intra-professional and inter-professional collaboration. Doctors from different disciplines adopt different, and sometimes conflicting, clinical approaches, doctors and nurses construct discipline-specific professional identities, and conflicts emerge between doctors and nurses from different disciplines over the regulation of the medical-nursing boundary. Achieving collaboration and integration between professionals from different disciplines may be particularly challenging when the group with less institutional power (nurses, in this case) has developed a high level of expertise on the needs of the patients targeted by the team. Effective interdisciplinary work thus requires not only bridging boundaries within the medical professional group, but also addressing the dynamics of resistance in merging doctors and nurses with different disciplinary backgrounds. In the paper, we summarise these results in a framework that contributes knowledge to the field of professional boundaries in healthcare while offering practical insights to forge new interdisciplinary relationships, which are more embedded in the daily experience of care providers.
提供跨学科综合护理是当代卫生政策的核心。因此,世界各地的医院都在试图摆脱围绕学科专业化建立的功能性护理组织,转向通过多学科团队提供护理的方式。然而,仅仅存在这样的团队并不能保证跨医学学科的整合与协作工作,这可能会受到专业之间和专业内部界限的阻碍。本文分析了影响新组建的多学科团队中协作与护理整合的界限。实证数据来自于对一家意大利公立医院亚重症卒中单元进行的人种学研究。数据收集包括180小时的观察以及与42名医疗服务提供者的交谈。研究结果表明,学科界限阻碍了专业内部和专业之间的协作。不同学科的医生采用不同的、有时甚至相互冲突的临床方法,医生和护士构建特定学科的专业身份,并且不同学科的医生和护士在医疗护理界限的规范方面出现冲突。当机构权力较小的群体(在这种情况下是护士)在团队所针对患者的需求方面发展出高水平的专业知识时,实现不同学科专业人员之间的协作与整合可能会特别具有挑战性。因此,有效的跨学科工作不仅需要弥合医学专业群体内部的界限,还需要应对在融合具有不同学科背景的医生和护士时的抵制动态。在本文中,我们将这些结果总结在一个框架中,该框架为医疗保健领域的专业界限知识做出了贡献,同时为建立新的跨学科关系提供了实际见解,这些关系更多地融入了护理提供者的日常经验。