Tomblin J Bruce, Harrison Melody, Ambrose Sophie E, Walker Elizabeth A, Oleson Jacob J, Moeller Mary Pat
1Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA; 2Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; 3Center for Childhood Deafness, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, USA; and 4Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Ear Hear. 2015 Nov-Dec;36 Suppl 1(0 1):76S-91S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000219.
This study examined the language outcomes of children with mild to severe hearing loss during the preschool years. The longitudinal design was leveraged to test whether language growth trajectories were associated with degree of hearing loss and whether aided hearing influenced language growth in a systematic manner. The study also explored the influence of the timing of hearing aid fitting and extent of use on children's language growth. Finally, the study tested the hypothesis that morphosyntax may be at particular risk due to the demands it places on the processing of fine details in the linguistic input.
The full cohort of children in this study comprised 290 children who were hard of hearing (CHH) and 112 children with normal hearing who participated in the Outcomes of Children with Hearing Loss (OCHL) study between the ages of 2 and 6 years. CHH had a mean better-ear pure-tone average of 47.66 dB HL (SD = 13.35). All children received a comprehensive battery of language measures at annual intervals, including standardized tests, parent-report measures, and spontaneous and elicited language samples. Principal components analysis supported the use of a single composite language score for each of the age levels (2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years). Measures of unaided (better-ear pure-tone average, speech intelligibility index) and aided (residualized speech intelligibility index) hearing were collected, along with parent-report measures of daily hearing aid use time. Mixed modeling procedures were applied to examine the rate of change (227 CHH; 94 children with normal hearing) in language ability over time in relation to (1) degree of hearing loss, (2) aided hearing, (3) age of hearing aid fit and duration of use, and (4) daily hearing aid use. Principal components analysis was also employed to examine factor loadings from spontaneous language samples and to test their correspondence with standardized measures. Multiple regression analysis was used to test for differential effects of hearing loss on morphosyntax and lexical development.
Children with mild to severe hearing loss, on average, showed depressed language levels compared with peers with normal hearing who were matched on age and socioeconomic status. The degree to which CHH fell behind increased with greater severity of hearing loss. The amount of improved audibility with hearing aids was associated with differential rates of language growth; better audibility was associated with faster rates of language growth in the preschool years. Children fit early with hearing aids had better early language achievement than children fit later. However, children who were fit after 18 months of age improved in their language abilities as a function of the duration of hearing aid use. These results suggest that the language learning system remains open to experience provided by improved access to linguistic input. Performance in the domain of morphosyntax was found to be more delayed in CHH than their semantic abilities.
The data obtained in this study largely support the predictions, suggesting that mild to severe hearing loss places children at risk for delays in language development. Risks are moderated by the provision of early and consistent access to well-fit hearing aids that provide optimized audibility.
本研究考察了轻至重度听力损失儿童在学前阶段的语言发展结果。采用纵向设计来检验语言发展轨迹是否与听力损失程度相关,以及助听是否以一种系统的方式影响语言发展。该研究还探讨了助听器验配时间和使用时长对儿童语言发展的影响。最后,该研究检验了以下假设:由于形态句法对语言输入中精细细节处理的要求,它可能面临特别的风险。
本研究的全部队列包括290名听力障碍儿童(CHH)和112名听力正常儿童,他们在2至6岁期间参与了听力损失儿童结局(OCHL)研究。CHH较好耳的平均纯音听阈为47.66 dB HL(标准差 = 13.35)。所有儿童每年接受一系列全面的语言测量,包括标准化测试、家长报告测量以及自发和诱发语言样本。主成分分析支持为每个年龄水平(2、3、4、5和6岁)使用单一的综合语言分数。收集了未助听(较好耳纯音听阈、言语可懂度指数)和助听(残差言语可懂度指数)听力测量数据,以及家长报告的每日助听器使用时间测量数据。应用混合建模程序来检验语言能力随时间的变化率(227名CHH;94名听力正常儿童)与以下因素的关系:(1)听力损失程度,(2)助听,(3)助听器验配年龄和使用时长,以及(4)每日助听器使用情况。还采用主成分分析来检验自发语言样本的因子负荷,并测试它们与标准化测量的对应关系。多元回归分析用于检验听力损失对形态句法和词汇发展的差异影响。
与年龄和社会经济地位相匹配的听力正常同龄人相比,轻至重度听力损失儿童的语言水平平均较低。CHH落后的程度随着听力损失严重程度的增加而增加。助听器带来的可听度改善程度与不同的语言发展速率相关;更好的可听度与学前阶段更快的语言发展速率相关。早期验配助听器的儿童比晚期验配的儿童早期语言成绩更好。然而,18个月龄后验配助听器的儿童,其语言能力随着助听器使用时长的增加而提高。这些结果表明,语言学习系统仍然对通过改善语言输入获取而提供的经验开放。发现CHH在形态句法领域的表现比其语义能力更滞后。
本研究获得的数据在很大程度上支持了这些预测,表明轻至重度听力损失使儿童面临语言发展延迟的风险。通过早期且持续地使用适配良好、能提供优化可听度的助听器,可以降低风险。