Gooptu Angshuman, Moriya Asako S, Simon Kosali I, Sommers Benjamin D
Angshuman Gooptu is a doctoral student in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University, in Bloomington.
Asako S. Moriya (
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jan;35(1):111-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0747.
Medicaid expansion undertaken through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is already producing major changes in insurance coverage and access to care, but its potential impacts on the labor market are also important policy considerations. Economic theory suggests that receipt of Medicaid might benefit workers who would no longer be tied to specific jobs to receive health insurance (known as job lock), giving them more flexibility in their choice of employment, or might encourage low-income workers to reduce their hours or stop working if they no longer need employment-based insurance. Evidence on labor changes after previous Medicaid expansions is mixed. To view the impact of the ACA on current labor market participation, we analyzed labor-market participation among adults with incomes below 138 percent of the federal poverty level, comparing Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states and Medicaid-eligible and -ineligible groups, for the pre-ACA period (2005-13) and the first fifteen months of the expansion (January 2014-March 2015). Medicaid expansion did not result in significant changes in employment, job switching, or full- versus part-time status. While we cannot exclude the possibility of small changes in these outcomes, our findings rule out the large change found in one influential pre-ACA study; furthermore, they suggest that the Medicaid expansion has had limited impact on labor-market outcomes thus far.
通过《平价医疗法案》(ACA)进行的医疗补助扩大计划已经在保险覆盖范围和医疗服务可及性方面带来了重大变化,但其对劳动力市场的潜在影响也是重要的政策考量因素。经济理论表明,获得医疗补助可能会使那些不再因需要获得医疗保险而受制于特定工作的工人受益(即所谓的“工作锁定”),从而使他们在就业选择上更具灵活性;或者可能会鼓励低收入工人减少工作时长或停止工作,如果他们不再需要基于就业的保险的话。关于以往医疗补助扩大计划后劳动力变化的证据并不一致。为了观察《平价医疗法案》对当前劳动力市场参与情况的影响,我们分析了收入低于联邦贫困线138%的成年人的劳动力市场参与情况,比较了医疗补助扩大州和未扩大州以及符合和不符合医疗补助资格的群体在《平价医疗法案》实施前时期(2005 - 2013年)和扩大计划的前十五个月(2014年1月 - 2015年3月)的情况。医疗补助扩大计划并未导致就业、工作转换或全职与兼职状态发生显著变化。虽然我们不能排除这些结果出现微小变化的可能性,但我们的研究结果排除了一项有影响力的《平价医疗法案》实施前研究中发现的巨大变化;此外,这些结果表明,到目前为止,医疗补助扩大计划对劳动力市场结果的影响有限。