Hutton Joe, Graham Selina
Gloucestershire NHS Trust, UK.
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Oct 12;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u204172.w3891. eCollection 2015.
Chest drain insertion is a common advanced procedure with a significant associated risk of pain, distress, and complications. Nationally, audit and recommendations from leading bodies have highlighted a number of safety concerns around chest drain insertion. Audit work has demonstrated poor levels of documentation; particularly around use of premedication, use of ultrasound guidance and consent. This has obvious potential consequences for patient safety and thus is an important target for improvement work. This project quantifies current standards of documentation and aims to improve this through a combination of accessible and easy to read guidelines, education, and the introduction of a chest drain insertion bundle. National best practice standards were identified through review of national guidance. Drain insertion was prospectively analysed over a three month period to establish baseline standards of documentation. This initial work was presented and a bundle and clinical guidelines produced. Chest drain insertion was then reaudited and assessed for improvement. Results demonstrated an improvement in many areas of documentation, pushing local results above the national average. However, only 40% of cases used the new bundle due to a mixture of staff rotation and an unexpectedly high proportion of drains inserted in non targeted areas including the emergency department, theatre, and intensive care. Despite this, the introduction of accessible guidance and bundle has significantly improved chest drain insertion documentation to the benefit of all.
胸腔引流管置入是一项常见的高级操作,伴有疼痛、不适和并发症等重大相关风险。在全国范围内,主要机构的审核和建议突出了围绕胸腔引流管置入的一些安全问题。审核工作显示记录水平较差;特别是在术前用药、超声引导的使用和知情同意方面。这对患者安全具有明显的潜在后果,因此是改进工作的一个重要目标。该项目对当前的记录标准进行量化,并旨在通过结合易于获取和阅读的指南、教育以及引入胸腔引流管置入综合方案来加以改进。通过审查国家指南确定了国家最佳实践标准。在三个月的时间里对引流管置入进行前瞻性分析,以确立记录的基线标准。展示了这项初步工作并制定了综合方案和临床指南。然后对胸腔引流管置入进行重新审核并评估改进情况。结果表明在记录的许多方面都有改进,使当地结果高于全国平均水平。然而,由于人员轮换以及在包括急诊科、手术室和重症监护室等非目标区域置入引流管的比例意外偏高,只有40%的病例使用了新的综合方案。尽管如此,引入易于获取的指南和综合方案已显著改善了胸腔引流管置入的记录,使各方受益。