Suppr超能文献

急性冠状动脉综合征中的医疗记录与医疗质量:CRUSADE研究结果

Medical records and quality of care in acute coronary syndromes: results from CRUSADE.

作者信息

Dunlay Shannon M, Alexander Karen P, Melloni Chiara, Kraschnewski Jennifer L, Liang Li, Gibler W Brian, Roe Matthew T, Ohman E Magnus, Peterson Eric D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2008 Aug 11;168(15):1692-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.15.1692.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient medical records are important means of communication among health care providers. Limited evaluation has been performed of the quality of the medical records or its association with health care processes or outcomes.

METHODS

We performed an empirical evaluation of the completeness of medical records from 607 randomly selected patients admitted with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) to 219 US hospitals in the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative. Composite medical records scores were summated and compared by hospital academic status and physician specialty. Correlations between medical records scores, use of evidence-based medicine (EBM), and in-hospital mortality were assessed.

RESULTS

Medical records were frequently missing key elements, including cardiac history (23.6%), performance status (64.6%), differential diagnosis (57.8%), and planned use of EBM (44.0%). Evidence-based medicine was more often discussed in medical records from academic medical centers vs nonacademic medical centers (69.7% vs 51.7%) (P < .001) and from cardiologists vs noncardiologists (60.5% vs 48.1%, P = .003). Higher medical records quality scores were associated with greater use of EBM among the medical records quality cohort (P = .006), and a similar trend was observed in CRUSADE overall: adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.72) for high vs low medical records quality. Higher medical records quality scores were associated with lower in-hospital mortality: adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical records for patients with NSTE ACS often lack key elements of the history and physical examination. Patients treated at hospitals with better medical records quality have significantly lower mortality and may receive more EBM. The relationship between better medical charting and better medical care could lead to new ways to monitor and improve the quality of medical care.

摘要

背景

患者病历是医疗服务提供者之间重要的沟通手段。对病历质量及其与医疗过程或结果的关联评估有限。

方法

我们在CRUSADE国家质量改进倡议中,对美国219家医院随机选取的607例非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE ACS)患者的病历完整性进行了实证评估。综合病历评分进行汇总,并按医院学术地位和医生专业进行比较。评估病历评分、循证医学(EBM)的使用与住院死亡率之间的相关性。

结果

病历经常缺失关键要素,包括心脏病史(23.6%)、功能状态(64.6%)、鉴别诊断(57.8%)和计划使用的循证医学(44.0%)。学术医疗中心的病历比非学术医疗中心更常讨论循证医学(69.7%对51.7%)(P <.001),心脏病专家的病历比非心脏病专家更常讨论(60.5%对48.1%,P =.003)。在病历质量队列中,较高的病历质量评分与更多使用循证医学相关(P =.006),在CRUSADE总体中也观察到类似趋势:高病历质量与低病历质量相比,调整后的优势比为1.26(95%置信区间,0.92 - 1.72)。较高的病历质量评分与较低的住院死亡率相关:调整后的优势比为0.79(95%置信区间,0.65 - 0.97)。

结论

NSTE ACS患者的病历常常缺乏病史和体格检查的关键要素。在病历质量较好的医院接受治疗的患者死亡率显著较低,并且可能接受更多的循证医学治疗。更好的病历记录与更好的医疗护理之间的关系可能会带来监测和改善医疗护理质量的新方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验