Teixeira Renan Kleber Costa, Yamaki Vitor Nagai, Pontes Ruy Victor Simões, Brito Marcus Vinicius Henriques, da Silva José Antonio Cordero
Faculty of Medicine, State University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015 Nov-Dec;28(4):247-9. doi: 10.1590/S0102-6720201500040007.
The instructions to authors are the only means of communication between researchers and the editorial standards of a scientific journal. One of the mandatory items to be contained therein is about the ethical part, to prevent new research to carry out abuses with the enrolled on the research are published and stimulated.
To verify the ethical questions on the guidelines of Brazilian surgical journals Method: Thirteen selected journals were divided into two groups: general surgery (n=3), and surgical specialty (n=10). The instructions to authors were analyzed by the quote of ethical requirements based on a specific research protocol, ranging from zero to six points.
The average score of the general surgery group was similar than that of the surgical specialty group (3.66±0.57 vs 3.30±1.15, p=0.6154). When each ethical requirement was compared between the groups, there was no significant difference between the ethical requirements (p<0.05).
There was respect for most ethical questions evaluated, with no difference between the journals of general or specialty surgery.
作者须知是研究人员与科学期刊编辑标准之间的唯一沟通方式。其中必须包含的一项内容是关于伦理部分，以防止新的研究对参与研究的人员进行滥用行为，并鼓励研究成果的发表。
验证巴西外科期刊指南中的伦理问题。方法：选取13种期刊分为两组：普通外科（n = 3）和外科专科（n = 10）。根据特定研究方案，通过引用伦理要求对作者须知进行分析，分数范围为0至6分。
普通外科组的平均得分与外科专科组相似（3.66±0.57对3.30±1.15，p = 0.6154）。当比较两组之间的每项伦理要求时，伦理要求之间没有显著差异（p<0.05）。
对于所评估的大多数伦理问题都给予了尊重，普通外科或专科外科期刊之间没有差异。
