Suppr超能文献

食品中非O157产志贺毒素大肠杆菌检测方法的评估

Evaluation of detection methods for non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli from food.

作者信息

Verhaegen Bavo, Van Damme Inge, Heyndrickx Marc, Botteldoorn Nadine, Elhadidy Mohamed, Verstraete Karen, Dierick Katelijne, Denayer Sarah, De Zutter Lieven, De Reu Koen

机构信息

Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090 Melle, Belgium; Ghent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.

Ghent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Food Microbiol. 2016 Feb 16;219:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 19.

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) remains a major foodborne pathogen of concern across the globe. Rapid detection and isolation of this pathogen is of great importance for public health reasons. In this study the detection and isolation of four non-O157 STEC strains (O26, O103, O111, O145) from different artificially contaminated matrices, namely ground (minced) beef, cattle carcass swab, lettuce mix and sprouted soy beans, were evaluated. Low amounts of STEC were used (0.25-1.40 cfu/g) to spike the samples. All samples were enriched in parallel in Buffered Peptone Water (BPW) and Brila broth. After enrichment, detection was performed using real-time PCR (qPCR), and isolation using two chromogenic agar media, CHROMagar™ STEC and ChromID™ EHEC. Inoculation on the agar media was performed either directly after enrichment or after the use of an acid treatment procedure. Furthermore, the use of this procedure was also tested on naturally contaminated food products, using 150 stx-positive samples. Although the qPCR Cycle Threshold (Ct) values were lower after enrichment in Brila broth, no significant differences in recovery were observed between both enrichment broths. Both agar media were equally suitable for the isolation of STEC, although a significantly higher recovery was obtained when using both agar media in parallel. For samples with a Ct value above 25, an acid treatment step prior to isolation ensured a significant improvement in the recovery of STEC due to the reduction in background microbiota. This acid treatment procedure proved especially useful for the isolation of STEC from sprouted soy bean samples.

摘要

产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)仍是全球关注的主要食源性病原体。出于公共卫生原因,快速检测和分离这种病原体至关重要。在本研究中,评估了从不同人工污染基质(即绞碎牛肉、牛胴体拭子、混合生菜和发芽大豆)中检测和分离四种非O157 STEC菌株(O26、O103、O111、O145)的情况。使用少量STEC(0.25 - 1.40 cfu/g)对样品进行加标。所有样品在缓冲蛋白胨水(BPW)和Brila肉汤中平行富集。富集后,使用实时PCR(qPCR)进行检测,并使用两种显色琼脂培养基CHROMagar™ STEC和ChromID™ EHEC进行分离。在琼脂培养基上接种要么在富集后直接进行,要么在使用酸处理程序之后进行。此外,还使用150个stx阳性样品在天然污染的食品上测试了该程序的使用情况。尽管在Brila肉汤中富集后qPCR循环阈值(Ct)值较低,但两种富集肉汤之间在回收率上未观察到显著差异。两种琼脂培养基同样适用于STEC的分离,尽管同时使用两种琼脂培养基时回收率显著更高。对于Ct值高于25的样品,分离前的酸处理步骤由于减少了背景微生物群而确保了STEC回收率的显著提高。这种酸处理程序被证明对从发芽大豆样品中分离STEC特别有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验