Kaarela K, Lehtinen K, Skinhøj A, Andersen F
Rheumatism Foundation Hospital, Heinola, Finland.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1989;11(7):427-31. doi: 10.1185/03007998909115929.
In a double-blind, crossover trial a controlled-release multiple-units indomethacin formulation (50 mg twice daily) was compared with conventional capsules (25 mg twice daily with 50 mg in the evening) in 12 young and 18 elderly in-patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Earlier findings that younger patients preferred a slow-release formulation and the elderly a standard formulation could not be confirmed. As a whole, the duration of morning stiffness was reduced more (p = 0.02) with the controlled-release formulation than with the conventional formulation. During the treatment period (7 days), 4 patients reported side-effects from the conventional capsules, 3 from the controlled-release formulation, and 6 from both treatments; 53% of the patients preferred the controlled-release formulation, while 20% preferred the conventional capsule (p = 0.046).
在一项双盲交叉试验中,将一种控释多单元吲哚美辛制剂(每日两次,每次50毫克)与传统胶囊(每日两次,每次25毫克,晚上加服50毫克)在12名年轻和18名老年类风湿性关节炎住院患者中进行了比较。早期关于年轻患者更喜欢缓释制剂而老年患者更喜欢标准制剂的研究结果未能得到证实。总体而言,控释制剂比传统制剂更能有效缩短晨僵持续时间(p = 0.02)。在治疗期间(7天),4名患者报告传统胶囊有副作用,3名患者报告控释制剂有副作用,6名患者报告两种治疗均有副作用;53%的患者更喜欢控释制剂,而20%的患者更喜欢传统胶囊(p = 0.046)。