Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1990-1999. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.033.
In the absence of effective clinical pharmacotherapy for prevention of reperfusion-mediated injury, this study re-evaluated the effects of intracoronary adenosine on infarct size and no-reflow in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction using clinical bolus and experimental high-dose infusion regimens.
Despite the clear cardioprotective effects of adenosine, when administered prior to ischemia, studies on cardioprotection by adenosine when administered at reperfusion have yielded contradictory results in both pre-clinical and clinical settings.
Swine (54 ± 1 kg) were subjected to a 45-min mid-left anterior descending artery occlusion followed by 2 h of reperfusion. In protocol A, an intracoronary bolus of 3 mg adenosine injected over 1 min (n = 5) or saline (n = 10) was administered at reperfusion. In protocol B, an intracoronary infusion of 50 μg/kg/min adenosine (n = 15) or saline (n = 21) was administered starting 5 min prior to reperfusion and continued throughout the 2-h reperfusion period.
In protocol A, area-at-risk, infarct size, and no-reflow were similar between groups. In protocol B, risk zones were similar, but administration of adenosine resulted in significant reductions in infarct size from 59 ± 3% of the area-at-risk in control swine to 46 ± 4% (p = 0.02), and no-reflow from 49 ± 6% of the infarct area to 26 ± 6% (p = 0.03).
During reperfusion, intracoronary adenosine can limit infarct size and no-reflow in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction. However, protection was only observed when adenosine was administered via prolonged high-dose infusion, and not via short-acting bolus injection. These findings warrant reconsideration of adenosine as an adjuvant therapy during early reperfusion.
在缺乏有效临床药物治疗预防再灌注介导损伤的情况下,本研究通过临床推注和实验高剂量输注方案,重新评估了冠状动脉内腺苷对急性心肌梗死猪模型中梗死面积和无复流的影响。
尽管腺苷具有明确的心脏保护作用,但当在缺血前给予时,在临床前和临床环境中,腺苷在再灌注时给予的心脏保护作用的研究结果相互矛盾。
猪(54 ± 1 公斤)经历 45 分钟的左前降支中段闭塞,随后进行 2 小时的再灌注。在方案 A 中,在再灌注时经冠状动脉内推注 3 毫克腺苷(n = 5)或生理盐水(n = 10)1 分钟。在方案 B 中,在再灌注前 5 分钟开始并持续整个 2 小时再灌注期间,经冠状动脉内输注 50 μg/kg/min 腺苷(n = 15)或生理盐水(n = 21)。
在方案 A 中,危险区、梗死面积和无复流在两组之间相似。在方案 B 中,危险区相似,但腺苷的给药导致梗死面积从对照组猪的危险区的 59 ± 3%显著减少至 46 ± 4%(p = 0.02),并且无复流从梗死区的 49 ± 6%减少至 26 ± 6%(p = 0.03)。
在再灌注期间,冠状动脉内腺苷可限制急性心肌梗死猪模型中的梗死面积和无复流。然而,只有当腺苷通过长时间高剂量输注而不是通过短时间推注给药时,才观察到保护作用。这些发现值得重新考虑在早期再灌注期间将腺苷作为辅助治疗。