Amberg Chloé E A, Collart Tim, Salenbien Wout, Egger Lisa M, Munnecke Axel, Nielsen Arne T, Monnet Claude, Hammer Øyvind, Vandenbroucke Thijs R A
UMR 8198 du CNRS: Evo-Eco-Paleo, Université de Lille - Sciences et Technologies, Avenue Paul Langevin, SN5, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Department of Geology (WE13), Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 7;6:18787. doi: 10.1038/srep18787.
Ordovician limestone-marl alternations in the Oslo-Asker District have been interpreted as signaling glacio-eustatic lowstands, which would support a prolonged "Early Palaeozoic Icehouse". However, these rhythmites could alternatively reflect differential diagenesis, without sedimentary trigger. Here, we test both hypotheses through one Darriwilian and three Katian sections. Our methodology consists of a bed-by-bed analysis of palynological (chitinozoan) and geochemical (XRF) data, to evaluate whether the limestone/marl couplets reflect an original cyclic signal. The results reveal similar palynomorph assemblages in limestones and marls. Exceptions, which could be interpreted as reflecting palaeoclimatological fluctuations, exist at the species level: Ancyrochitina bornholmensis seems to be more abundant in the marl samples from the lower Frognerkilen Formation on Nakkholmen Island. However, these rare cases where chitinozoans differ between limestone/marl facies are deemed insufficient for the identification of original cyclicity. The geochemical data show a near-perfect correlation between insoluble elements in the limestone and the marls, which indicates a similar composition of the potential precursor sediment, also in the Frognerkilen Formation. This is consistent with the palynological data. Although an original cyclic pattern could still be recorded by other, uninvestigated parameters, our palaeontological and geochemical data combined do not support the presence of such a signal.
奥斯陆-阿斯克地区的奥陶纪石灰岩-泥灰岩交替层被解释为标志着冰川-海平面低水位,这将支持一个持续的“早古生代冰室”。然而,这些韵律层也可能反映了差异成岩作用,而没有沉积触发因素。在这里,我们通过一个达瑞威尔阶和三个凯迪阶剖面来检验这两种假设。我们的方法包括对孢粉学(几丁虫)和地球化学(X射线荧光光谱仪)数据进行逐床分析,以评估石灰岩/泥灰岩对偶层是否反映了原始的周期性信号。结果显示,石灰岩和泥灰岩中的孢粉组合相似。在物种层面存在一些可能被解释为反映古气候波动的例外情况:在纳克霍尔门岛上的下弗罗格纳基伦组泥灰岩样品中,博恩霍尔姆锚几丁虫似乎更为丰富。然而,这些几丁虫在石灰岩/泥灰岩相之间存在差异的罕见情况被认为不足以识别原始的周期性。地球化学数据显示,石灰岩和泥灰岩中的不溶性元素之间存在近乎完美的相关性,这表明在弗罗格纳基伦组中,潜在的前体沉积物组成也相似。这与孢粉学数据一致。尽管其他未研究的参数可能仍记录了原始的周期性模式,但我们综合的古生物学和地球化学数据并不支持这种信号的存在。