Munoz-Millan R J, Casteel C R
Institute of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1989 Jul;40(7):699-707. doi: 10.1176/ps.40.7.699.
A review of the literature of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) for the last four years shows parsimonious progress in research and on other fronts. Prospective studies are steadily replacing retrospective investigations, and the assessment of measures used to determine symptomatology and response to treatment is becoming increasingly sophisticated. A major development was the publication in 1987 of DSM-III-R, which significantly revised the diagnostic criteria for ADHD and reconceptualized ADHD and related disorders. The authors review this area along with questions about the validity of the classification, conditions associated with ADHD, current etiological theories, differential diagnosis, and treatment.
对过去四年注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）文献的回顾显示，在研究及其他方面进展甚微。前瞻性研究正稳步取代回顾性调查，用于确定症状及治疗反应的测量评估也日益精细。一项重大进展是1987年《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本（DSM-III-R）的出版，它显著修订了ADHD的诊断标准，并对ADHD及相关障碍进行了重新概念化。作者们回顾了这一领域，以及关于分类的有效性、与ADHD相关的病症、当前病因理论、鉴别诊断和治疗等问题。
