Clark Leslie H, Jackson Amanda L, Gehrig Paola A, Bae-Jump Victoria, Van Le Linda, Ko Emily M
*Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; and †Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Feb;26(2):282-9. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000605.
The aim of the study were to evaluate the gap between recommended and received adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with endometrial cancer (EC) and to determine the percent of women 70 years and older who would meet enrollment criteria for representative Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials.
An institutional review board approved retrospective chart review of all EC cases from a tertiary care institution from 2005 to 2010 was performed. Clinical, surgical, and pathologic data were abstracted from electronic medical records. Gynecologic Oncology Group protocols 249, 209, and 229L were selected as representative national EC trials. Patients were evaluated for eligibility by each protocol's criteria.
Twenty-six percent (280/1064) of patients with EC were older than 70 years. More than 60% (181/280) of elderly patients with EC were recommended to undergo adjuvant therapy. By therapy type, 64% (48/75) of elderly patients who were recommended adjuvant radiation received it, 53% (49/92) of elderly patients who were recommended combination chemotherapy and radiation received it, and 29% (4/14) of elderly patients who were recommended chemotherapy received it. In evaluating enrollment criteria for GOG 249, 30% (40/134) of pathologically eligible patients would have been eliminated for medical clearance; for GOG 209, 31% (26/86) would have been eliminated, and for GOG 229L, 9% (4/45) would have been eliminated purely for medical reasons.
More adjuvant treatment is recommended in the elderly patients because of a higher incidence of advanced disease and aggressive histopathology. Approximately half of the elderly patients who were recommended treatment actually received it. In addition, clinical trial data are limited for elderly patients because approximately one third of the women aged 70 years and older who meet pathologic enrollment criteria for trials were excluded because of complex medical disease.
本研究旨在评估老年子宫内膜癌(EC)患者推荐的辅助治疗与实际接受的辅助治疗之间的差距,并确定70岁及以上符合代表性妇科肿瘤学组(GOG)试验入组标准的女性比例。
对一家三级医疗机构2005年至2010年所有EC病例进行机构审查委员会批准的回顾性病历审查。从电子病历中提取临床、手术和病理数据。选择GOG方案249、209和229L作为代表性的全国性EC试验。根据每个方案的标准评估患者的 eligibility。
26%(280/1064)的EC患者年龄超过70岁。超过60%(181/280)的老年EC患者被建议接受辅助治疗。按治疗类型划分,被建议接受辅助放疗的老年患者中有64%(48/75)接受了放疗,被建议接受联合化疗和放疗的老年患者中有53%(49/92)接受了治疗,被建议接受化疗的老年患者中有29%(4/14)接受了治疗。在评估GOG 249的入组标准时,30%(40/134)病理合格的患者会因医疗许可而被排除;对于GOG 209,31%(26/86)会被排除,对于GOG 229L,9%(4/45)会纯粹因医疗原因被排除。
由于晚期疾病和侵袭性组织病理学的发生率较高,老年患者被建议接受更多的辅助治疗。约一半被建议治疗的老年患者实际接受了治疗。此外,老年患者的临床试验数据有限,因为约三分之一符合试验病理入组标准的70岁及以上女性因复杂的内科疾病而被排除。