Driver Jane A, Viswanathan Akila N
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States; Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jun;145(3):526-530. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
To determine if readily obtainable markers of frailty predict disease-free survival (DFS) in elderly women with endometrial cancer treated with curative intent.
88 consecutive women≥age 60 treated with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation for stage I-IV endometrial cancer were included. We considered the following health deficits as markers of "frailty": albumin <3.5mg/dL, hemoglobin <10mg/dL, BMI<20kg/m, unintentional weight loss, ECOG performance status ≥2, history of osteopenia or osteoporosis and Charlson comorbidity score. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models of DFS were calculated.
The median age was 68.5 (range 60-88years). The majority of women (65/88) had at least one frailty factor at baseline and 23/88 had two or more. All women received radiation and chemotherapy. Treatment was delayed, modified or truncated in 46% (40/88) of women due to treatment-related toxicity. Age (< 70 vs. ≥70 y) did not independently predict toxicity or recurrence risk. Women with at least one baseline frailty factor had twice the risk of disease recurrence (HR=2.21;95% CI:1.02-4.80) when adjusted for age, stage, grade and Charlson score. The 3-year DFS was 77% in those with no frailty markers and 48% in those with at least one (p=0.02). The presence of a frailty marker also predicted shortened overall survival (HR=2.34;95% CI:1.08-5.03) irrespective of treatment administered and stage of disease.
A combined frailty measure was a more robust predictor of DFS and OS than patient age, tumor characteristics and comorbidities in this cohort of older women with very good functional status.
确定易于获得的衰弱标志物是否能预测接受根治性治疗的老年子宫内膜癌女性的无病生存期(DFS)。
纳入88例连续的年龄≥60岁、接受手术、化疗和放疗的I-IV期子宫内膜癌女性。我们将以下健康缺陷视为“衰弱”的标志物:白蛋白<3.5mg/dL、血红蛋白<10mg/dL、体重指数<20kg/m²、非故意体重减轻、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态≥2、骨质减少或骨质疏松病史以及查尔森合并症评分。计算DFS的Kaplan-Meier估计值和Cox比例风险模型。
中位年龄为68.5岁(范围60-88岁)。大多数女性(65/88)在基线时至少有一个衰弱因素,23/88有两个或更多。所有女性均接受了放疗和化疗。46%(40/88)的女性因治疗相关毒性导致治疗延迟、调整或中断。年龄(<70岁与≥70岁)并不能独立预测毒性或复发风险。在调整年龄、分期、分级和查尔森评分后,至少有一个基线衰弱因素的女性疾病复发风险是两倍(风险比=2.21;95%置信区间:1.02-4.80)。无衰弱标志物的患者3年DFS为77%,至少有一个衰弱标志物的患者为48%(p=0.02)。无论给予何种治疗和疾病分期,衰弱标志物的存在也预示着总生存期缩短(风险比=2.34;95%置信区间:1.08-5.03)。
在这组功能状态非常好的老年女性中,综合衰弱指标比患者年龄、肿瘤特征和合并症更能有力地预测DFS和总生存期(OS)。