Winfield Jessica M, Collins David J, Priest Andrew N, Quest Rebecca A, Glover Alan, Hunter Sally, Morgan Veronica A, Freeman Susan, Rockall Andrea, deSouza Nandita M
MRI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom and Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, United Kingdom.
Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Med Phys. 2016 Jan;43(1):95. doi: 10.1118/1.4937789.
To develop methods for optimization of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) in the abdomen and pelvis on 1.5 T MR scanners from three manufacturers and assess repeatability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) estimates in a temperature-controlled phantom and abdominal and pelvic organs in healthy volunteers.
Geometric distortion, ghosting, fat suppression, and repeatability and homogeneity of ADC estimates were assessed using phantoms and volunteers. Healthy volunteers (ten per scanner) were each scanned twice on the same scanner. One volunteer traveled to all three institutions in order to provide images for qualitative comparison. The common volunteer was excluded from quantitative analysis of the data from scanners 2 and 3 in order to ensure statistical independence, giving n = 10 on scanner 1 and n = 9 on scanners 2 and 3 for quantitative analysis. Repeatability and interscanner variation of ADC estimates in kidneys, liver, spleen, and uterus were assessed using within-patient coefficient of variation (wCV) and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively.
The coefficient of variation of ADC estimates in the temperature-controlled phantom was 1%-4% for all scanners. Images of healthy volunteers from all scanners showed homogeneous fat suppression and no marked ghosting or geometric distortion. The wCV of ADC estimates was 2%-4% for kidneys, 3%-7% for liver, 6%-9% for spleen, and 7%-10% for uterus. ADC estimates in kidneys, spleen, and uterus showed no significant difference between scanners but a significant difference was observed in liver (p < 0.05).
DW-MRI protocols can be optimized using simple phantom measurements to produce good quality images in the abdomen and pelvis at 1.5 T with repeatable quantitative measurements in a multicenter study.
开发用于在三台不同制造商的1.5T磁共振成像(MRI)扫描仪上优化腹部和盆腔扩散加权MRI(DW-MRI)的方法,并评估在温度控制的体模以及健康志愿者的腹部和盆腔器官中表观扩散系数(ADC)估计值的可重复性。
使用体模和志愿者评估几何畸变、鬼影、脂肪抑制以及ADC估计值的可重复性和均匀性。健康志愿者(每台扫描仪10名)在同一台扫描仪上各扫描两次。一名志愿者前往所有三个机构以提供用于定性比较的图像。为确保统计独立性,该共同志愿者被排除在扫描仪2和3的数据定量分析之外,从而扫描仪1的定量分析n = 10,扫描仪2和3的定量分析n = 9。分别使用患者内变异系数(wCV)和Kruskal-Wallis检验评估肾脏、肝脏、脾脏和子宫中ADC估计值的可重复性和扫描仪间差异。
所有扫描仪在温度控制体模中ADC估计值的变异系数为1%-4%。所有扫描仪上健康志愿者的图像均显示均匀的脂肪抑制,且无明显的鬼影或几何畸变。肾脏ADC估计值的wCV为2%-4%,肝脏为3%-7%,脾脏为6%-9%,子宫为7%-10%。肾脏、脾脏和子宫的ADC估计值在各扫描仪之间无显著差异,但肝脏中观察到显著差异(p < 0.05)。
在多中心研究中,DW-MRI方案可通过简单的体模测量进行优化,以在1.5T下在腹部和盆腔产生高质量图像,并具有可重复的定量测量结果。