Suppr超能文献

左心室辅助装置患者的血流动力学斜坡试验。

Hemodynamic Ramp Tests in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;4(3):208-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study tested whether combined invasive hemodynamic and echocardiographic ramp tests can help optimize patient management.

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for optimizing speed and medications in continuous flow ventricular assist device (cfLVAD) patients are mainly based on expert opinion.

METHODS

Thirty-five cfLVAD patients (21 HeartMate II [Thoratec, Pleasanton, California] and 14 HVAD [HeartWare International, Framingham, Massachusetts]) underwent ramp tests with right heart catheterization (including central venous pressure [CVP], pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP], and blood pressure) and echocardiography. Data were recorded at up to 9 speed settings. Speed changes were in steps of 400 revolutions per minute (RPM) for HeartMate II (8,000 to 12,000 RPM) and 100 RPM for HVAD (2,300 to 3,200 RPM) patients.

RESULTS

Only 42.9% of patients had normal CVPs and PCWPs at their original RPM settings. Going from lowest to highest speeds, cardiac output improved by 0.16 ± 0.19 l/min/step (total change 1.28 ± 1.41 l/min) and PCWP decreased by 1.23 ± 0.85 mm Hg/step (total change 9.9 ± 6.5 mm Hg). CVP and systolic blood pressure did not change significantly with RPM. RPM were adjusted based on test results to achieve CVPs and PCWPs as close to normal limits as possible, which was feasible in 56% of patients. For the remainder, results indicated which type of medical management should be pursued.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of combined hemodynamic and echocardiographic ramp tests in patients provides objective means of optimizing RPM, and has the potential to guide medical management. It remains to be tested whether this strategy has a beneficial impact on quality of life or clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验联合有创血流动力学和超声心动图 ramp 试验能否有助于优化患者管理。

背景

优化连续血流心室辅助装置(cfLVAD)患者的速度和药物的指南主要基于专家意见。

方法

35 例 cfLVAD 患者(21 例 HeartMate II [Thoratec,加利福尼亚州普莱森顿]和 14 例 HVAD [HeartWare International,马萨诸塞州弗雷明汉])接受了伴有右心导管检查(包括中心静脉压 [CVP]、肺动脉压、肺毛细血管楔压 [PCWP] 和血压)和超声心动图的 ramp 试验。在多达 9 种速度设置下记录数据。HeartMate II 的速度变化为每 400 转每分钟(RPM)一步(8000 至 12000 RPM),HVAD 的速度变化为每 100 RPM 一步(2300 至 3200 RPM)。

结果

仅有 42.9%的患者在其原始 RPM 设置下 CVP 和 PCWP 正常。从最低速度到最高速度,心输出量每步增加 0.16 ± 0.19 l/min/步(总变化 1.28 ± 1.41 l/min),PCWP 每步降低 1.23 ± 0.85 mmHg(总变化 9.9 ± 6.5 mmHg)。CVP 和收缩压随 RPM 变化不明显。根据试验结果调整 RPM 以尽可能使 CVP 和 PCWP 接近正常范围,在 56%的患者中是可行的。对于其余患者,结果表明应采用哪种类型的医疗管理。

结论

在患者中使用联合血流动力学和超声心动图 ramp 试验提供了优化 RPM 的客观手段,并有可能指导医疗管理。尚需检验这种策略是否对生活质量或临床结局有有益影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验