• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雷珠单抗与阿柏西普治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的成本效益:英国医疗保健视角

Cost-Effectiveness of Ranibizumab Versus Aflibercept for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A UK Healthcare Perspective.

作者信息

Adedokun Lola, Burke Colin

机构信息

Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, Frimley Business Park, Camberley, UK.

Novartis Ireland Limited, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2016 Jan;33(1):116-28. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0279-0. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1007/s12325-015-0279-0
PMID:26747252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4735224/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ranibizumab and aflibercept are anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents licensed for the treatment of visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). The aim of this study was to estimate, from a UK healthcare payer's perspective, the cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab versus aflibercept in this indication.

METHODS

A Markov model was used to simulate the outcomes and costs of treating BRVO. Patient baseline characteristics and efficacy data for ranibizumab were obtained from the BRAVO trial. The relative efficacy of aflibercept was derived from a published network meta-analysis. Injection frequencies were derived from ranibizumab and aflibercept studies included in the network meta-analysis. Health states were defined by increments of 10 letters in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Patients could gain or lose a maximum of two health states between cycles. The first cycle was 6 months, followed by monthly cycles. Different utility values were assigned to the better-seeing and worse-seeing eyes based on BCVA. A 2-year treatment time frame and a lifetime time horizon were used. Future costs and health outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Sensitivity analyses were used to test the robustness of the model.

RESULTS

The lifetime cost per patient treated was £15,273 with ranibizumab and £17,347 with aflibercept. Ranibizumab was dominant over aflibercept, producing incremental health gains of 0.0120 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost savings of £2074. Net monetary benefit for ranibizumab at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY was £2314. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust to variations in model parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Ranibizumab provides greater health gains at a lower overall cost than aflibercept in the treatment of visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to BRVO. Ranibizumab is therefore cost-effective from a UK healthcare payer's perspective.

FUNDING

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

摘要

引言

雷珠单抗和阿柏西普是经许可用于治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)继发黄斑水肿所致视力损害的抗血管内皮生长因子药物。本研究旨在从英国医疗保健支付方的角度评估雷珠单抗与阿柏西普在该适应症中的成本效益。

方法

采用马尔可夫模型模拟治疗BRVO的结果和成本。雷珠单抗的患者基线特征和疗效数据来自BRAVO试验。阿柏西普的相对疗效来自已发表的网络荟萃分析。注射频率来自网络荟萃分析中纳入的雷珠单抗和阿柏西普研究。健康状态根据最佳矫正视力(BCVA)每提高10个字母来定义。患者在周期之间最多可增减两个健康状态。第一个周期为6个月,之后为每月一个周期。根据BCVA为视力较好和较差的眼睛赋予不同的效用值。采用2年的治疗时间框架和终身时间范围。未来成本和健康结果按每年3.5%进行贴现。使用敏感性分析来检验模型的稳健性。

结果

接受雷珠单抗治疗的每位患者终身成本为15,273英镑,接受阿柏西普治疗的为17,347英镑。雷珠单抗相对于阿柏西普具有优势,产生了0.0120个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量健康收益,并节省了2074英镑的成本。在支付意愿阈值为20,000英镑/QALY时,雷珠单抗的净货币效益为2314英镑。敏感性分析表明,结果对模型参数的变化具有稳健性。

结论

在治疗BRVO继发黄斑水肿所致视力损害方面,雷珠单抗以较低的总体成本带来了更大的健康收益。因此,从英国医疗保健支付方的角度来看,雷珠单抗具有成本效益。

资金来源

瑞士巴塞尔诺华制药公司。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8530/4735224/8f12013c115b/12325_2015_279_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8530/4735224/5bedf06b803a/12325_2015_279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8530/4735224/46e70afdd95f/12325_2015_279_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8530/4735224/2f44669fae4e/12325_2015_279_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8530/4735224/8f12013c115b/12325_2015_279_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8530/4735224/5bedf06b803a/12325_2015_279_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8530/4735224/46e70afdd95f/12325_2015_279_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8530/4735224/2f44669fae4e/12325_2015_279_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8530/4735224/8f12013c115b/12325_2015_279_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Ranibizumab Versus Aflibercept for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A UK Healthcare Perspective.雷珠单抗与阿柏西普治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的成本效益:英国医疗保健视角
Adv Ther. 2016 Jan;33(1):116-28. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0279-0. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
2
Intravitreal ranibizumab versus aflibercept versus bevacizumab for macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion: the LEAVO non-inferiority three-arm RCT.玻璃体内雷珠单抗与阿柏西普和贝伐珠单抗治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿的比较:LEAVO 非劣效性三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jun;25(38):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta25380.
3
Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab versus aflibercept in the treatment of visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema: a UK healthcare perspective.雷珠单抗与阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿所致视力损害的成本效益:英国医疗保健视角
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 May 6;7:235-47. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S82556. eCollection 2015.
4
Real-World Effectiveness and Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Intravitreal Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies.真实世界中抗 VEGF 药物治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的疗效和成本效果分析:真实世界研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jan;37(1):300-315. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01147-6. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
5
Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab and aflibercept to treat diabetic macular edema from a US perspective: analysis of 2-year Protocol T data.从美国角度评估雷珠单抗和阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的成本效果:Protocol T 研究两年数据分析。
J Med Econ. 2020 Mar;23(3):287-296. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1666855. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
6
Comparison of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: Extrapolation of Data to Clinical Practice.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的比较:数据外推至临床实践
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;134(1):95-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4110.
7
Outcome of "treat and monitor" regimen of aflibercept and ranibizumab in macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion.阿柏西普和雷珠单抗“治疗并监测”方案用于非缺血性视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的疗效
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;39(1):145-153. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0798-6. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
8
The Cost-Effectiveness of Ranibizumab Treat and Extend Regimen Versus Aflibercept in the UK.雷珠单抗治疗并延长方案与阿柏西普在英国的成本效益
Adv Ther. 2016 Sep;33(9):1660-76. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0367-9. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
9
Brolucizumab vs aflibercept and ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a cost-effectiveness analysis.布罗鲁单抗对比阿柏西普和雷珠单抗治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性:一项成本效果分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jun;27(6):743-752. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.6.743.
10
Using Patient-Level Data to Develop Meaningful Cross-Trial Comparisons of Visual Impairment in Individuals with Diabetic Macular Edema.利用患者层面的数据进行糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者视力损害的有意义的跨试验比较。
Adv Ther. 2016 Apr;33(4):597-609. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0310-0. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of retinal vein occlusion.视网膜静脉阻塞的诊断和管理临床实践指南的系统评价。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Jun;38(9):1722-1733. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03008-1. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Rapid reduction of macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion with low-dose normobaric hyperoxia.低剂量常压高氧治疗视网膜静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿的快速消退
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;259(8):2113-2118. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05128-w. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
3
Cost-Utility of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion.

本文引用的文献

1
Intravitreal Aflibercept for Macular Edema Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 52-Week Results of the VIBRANT Study.玻璃体内阿柏西普治疗分支型视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿:VIBRANT 研究的 52 周结果。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):330-336. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.035. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of approved treatments for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: a network meta-analysis.视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的已批准治疗方法的疗效和安全性比较:一项网状荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 5;5(6):e007527. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007527.
3
Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab versus aflibercept in the treatment of visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema: a UK healthcare perspective.
抗血管内皮生长因子治疗继发于视网膜中央静脉阻塞的黄斑水肿的成本-效用分析。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Jul;5(7):656-663. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
雷珠单抗与阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿所致视力损害的成本效益:英国医疗保健视角
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 May 6;7:235-47. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S82556. eCollection 2015.
4
Intravitreal aflibercept for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: the 24-week results of the VIBRANT study.玻璃体内注射阿柏西普治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿:VIBRANT 研究 24 周结果。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Mar;122(3):538-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.031. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
5
Efficacy and adverse events of aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab in age-related macular degeneration: a trade-off analysis.阿柏西普、雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性的疗效及不良事件:一项权衡分析。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;99(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305149. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
6
Direct medical costs and resource use for treating central and branch retinal vein occlusion in commercially insured working-age and Medicare populations.商业保险覆盖的工作年龄人群和医疗保险人群中治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞和视网膜分支静脉阻塞的直接医疗费用及资源使用情况。
Retina. 2014 Nov;34(11):2250-8. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000217.
7
A United Kingdom-based economic evaluation of ranibizumab for patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO).一项基于英国的雷珠单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)患者的经济学评估。
J Med Econ. 2014 Jun;17(6):423-34. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.909435. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.抗血管内皮生长因子治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发的黄斑水肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD009510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009510.pub2.
9
Ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions: long-term follow-up in the HORIZON trial.雷珠单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿的长期随访:HORIZON 试验。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):802-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
10
Sustained benefits from ranibizumab for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: 12-month outcomes of a phase III study.雷珠单抗治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的持续获益:一项 III 期研究的 12 个月结果。
Ophthalmology. 2011 Aug;118(8):1594-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.022.