• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Brief Accessibility, Responsiveness, and Engagement Scale: A Tool for Measuring Attachment Behaviors in Clinical Couples.

作者信息

Sandberg Jonathan G, Novak Joshua R, Davis Stephanie Y, Busby Dean M

机构信息

Brigham Young University.

出版信息

J Marital Fam Ther. 2016 Jan;42(1):106-22. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12151. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1111/jmft.12151
PMID:26748730
Abstract

Measuring attachment behaviors is relevant to creating secure couple relationships. This article seeks to test and examine the reliability and validity of the Brief Accessibility, Responsiveness, and Engagement (BARE) Scale-a practical measure of couple attachment-in a clinical sample. Couples took the BARE and other assessments measuring relationship functioning (self and partner reports of relationship satisfaction, relationship stability, positive and negative communication, and attachment styles). Results suggest that the BARE appears to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing couple attachment and can accurately predict and classify whether the couples belong in the clinical or nonclinical group, as well as their level of relationship satisfaction. Results also indicate attachment behaviors are related to relationship outcomes.

摘要

相似文献

1
The Brief Accessibility, Responsiveness, and Engagement Scale: A Tool for Measuring Attachment Behaviors in Clinical Couples.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2016 Jan;42(1):106-22. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12151. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
2
The brief accessibility, responsiveness, and engagement (BARE) scale: a tool for measuring attachment behavior in couple relationships.简短可及性、反应性和参与度(BARE)量表:一种用于测量夫妻关系中依恋行为的工具。
Fam Process. 2012 Dec;51(4):512-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01422.x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
3
Using Difference Scores to Inform Therapy Practice: Differences in Perceptions of Attachment Behaviors between Partners in a Clinical Sample.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2018 Oct;44(4):624-639. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12303. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Differentiating Between Attachment Styles and Behaviors and their Association with Marital Quality.区分依恋风格与行为及其与婚姻质量的关联。
Fam Process. 2017 Jun;56(2):518-531. doi: 10.1111/famp.12186. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
5
Couple attachment and the quality of marital relationships: method and concept in the validation of the new couple attachment interview and coding system.夫妻依恋与婚姻关系质量:新型夫妻依恋访谈及编码系统验证中的方法与概念
Attach Hum Dev. 2005 Jun;7(2):123-52. doi: 10.1080/14616730500155170.
6
Partner attachment and interpersonal characteristics.伴侣依附和人际特征。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2013;39(2):144-59. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.606878.
7
Attachment and couple satisfaction as predictors of expressed emotion in women facing breast cancer and their partners in the immediate post-surgery period.在乳腺癌女性及其伴侣术后即刻阶段,依恋和夫妻满意度作为表达性情绪的预测因素。
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Feb;22(1):169-185. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12223. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
8
Assessing implicit motivational orientations in couple relationships: the Partner-Related Agency and Communion Test (PACT).评估伴侣关系中的内隐动机取向:伴侣相关自主性与关联性测验(PACT)。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):114-28. doi: 10.1037/a0024822. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
9
The Role of Attachment Behaviors in the Link between Relationship Satisfaction and Depression in Clinical Couples: Implications for Clinical Practice.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2017 Apr;43(2):352-363. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12201. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
10
Towards an integrative attachment-based model of relationship functioning.迈向关系功能的综合依附为本模型。
Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):413-34. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12047. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring therapeutic responsiveness: a comparative textual analysis across different models.探索治疗反应性:跨不同模型的比较文本分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 31;15:1412220. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1412220. eCollection 2024.