Suppr超能文献

不同牙刷及刷牙方法对牙菌斑清除效果的比较。

A comparison of plaque removal by different toothbrushes and toothbrushing methods.

作者信息

Arai T, Kinoshita S

出版信息

Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1977 Jun;24(2):177-88.

PMID:267517
Abstract

Six toothbrushing methods were evaluated using several kinds of toothbrushes. Two kinds of electric toothbrushes were tested also. Forty-two adults who had normal dentition and clinically healthy peridontal tissue, aged 20 to 34, 36 males and 6 females, volunteered for this study. The plaque score was calculated by the modified Volpe's method on which Suzuki et al. reported before. The scoring of the plaque was restricted to the six teeth (formula: see text) The average percentage of plaque removal from the total (labial and lingual) tooth surface by different toothbrushing methods was as follows: (1) 75.2 +/- 9.9% by the Fones method with a hard brush, (2) 71.7 +/- 11.1% by the Scrub method with a hard brush, (3) 67.4 +/- 12.5% by the modified Stillman's method with a hard brush, (4) 64.7 +/- 13.7% by the National electric toothbrush with a soft brush, (5) 62.9 +/- 13.6% by the Roll method with a hard brush (6) 58.1 +/- 16.3% by the Charters method with a brush of a medium hardness, (7) 55.2 +/- 10.2% by the Bass method with a brush of a medium harness. A similar tendency was obtained independently on the labial, lingual and papillary tooth surface. The hard brush was the most effective for the plaque removal by all kinds of brushing methods.

摘要

使用几种牙刷对六种刷牙方法进行了评估。还测试了两种电动牙刷。42名年龄在20至34岁之间、牙列正常且临床牙周组织健康的成年人自愿参与了这项研究,其中男性36名,女性6名。菌斑评分采用铃木等人之前报道的改良沃尔普方法计算。菌斑评分仅限于六颗牙齿(公式:见正文)。不同刷牙方法从牙齿总(唇面和舌面)表面去除菌斑的平均百分比如下:(1)使用硬毛牙刷的Fones法为75.2±9.9%,(2)使用硬毛牙刷的擦洗法为71.7±11.1%,(3)使用硬毛牙刷的改良Stillman法为67.4±12.5%,(4)使用软毛牙刷的国产电动牙刷为64.7±13.7%,(5)使用硬毛牙刷的Roll法为62.9±13.6%,(6)使用中等硬度牙刷的Charters法为58.1±16.3%,(7)使用中等硬度牙刷的巴斯法为55.2±10.2%。在牙齿的唇面、舌面和乳头面独立获得了类似的趋势。对于所有刷牙方法,硬毛牙刷在去除菌斑方面最有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验