• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良巴氏刷牙法、Fones刷牙法与普通刷牙法对年轻成年人牙菌斑控制效果的比较——一项随机临床试验

Comparison of modified Bass, Fones and normal tooth brushing technique for the efficacy of plaque control in young adults- A randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Janakiram Chandrashekar, Varghese Naveen, Venkitachalam Ramanarayanan, Joseph Joe, Vineetha Karuveettil

机构信息

Professor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry. Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, AIMS, Ponekkara P. O., Kochi 682041.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Feb 1;12(2):e123-e129. doi: 10.4317/jced.55747. eCollection 2020 Feb.

DOI:10.4317/jced.55747
PMID:32071693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7018473/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the anti plaque efficacy of Modified Bass, Fones and Normal brushing techniques in young adults.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An investigator blinded randomized controlled trial with parallel design was adopted to compare the anti plaque efficacy of three tooth brushing techniques. The study population consisted of 120 dental students aged between 18 and 30 years.

RESULTS

At the baseline, the mean plaque scores were 0.74 ± 0.39, 0.77 ± 0.34 and 0.98 ± 0.36 respectively, for Modified Bass, Fones and Normal brushing technique. After 24 hours without any oral hygiene activity, the plaque scores increased to 1.04 ± 0.30, 1.11 ± 0.32 and 1.21 ± 0.40, respectively. After 1 week of using the intervention, the mean plaque scores were 0.78 ± 0.36, 0.94 ± 0.34 and 1.03 ± 0.43, respectively and increased to 1.13 ± 0.44, 1.14 ± 0.40 and 1.08 ± 0.34 after 28 days. The mean gingival scores were 0.23 ± 0.66, 0.02 ± 0.52 and 0.42 ± 0.74 for Modified Bass, Fones and Normal Brushing technique during baseline visit and after 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant reduction in the amount of plaque with the three brushing techniques. Although the short-term outcomes with the Modified Bass method were promising, a long-term effect was not evident. Further, there was no significant difference in plaque control between the three groups. Gingival scores, plaque scores, tooth brushing techniques, young adults.

摘要

背景

比较改良巴氏刷牙法、Fones刷牙法和普通刷牙法在年轻成年人中的防菌斑效果。

材料与方法

采用单盲随机平行对照试验比较三种刷牙方法的防菌斑效果。研究对象为120名年龄在18至30岁之间的牙科专业学生。

结果

基线时,改良巴氏刷牙法、Fones刷牙法和普通刷牙法的平均菌斑评分分别为0.74±0.39、0.77±0.34和0.98±0.36。在24小时未进行任何口腔卫生活动后,菌斑评分分别增至1.04±0.30、1.11±0.32和1.21±0.40。在使用干预方法1周后,平均菌斑评分分别为0.78±0.36、0.94±0.34和1.03±0.43,28天后分别增至1.13±0.44、1.14±0.40和1.08±0.34。基线访视时及28天后,改良巴氏刷牙法、Fones刷牙法和普通刷牙法的平均牙龈评分为0.23±0.66、0.02±0.52和0.42±0.74。

结论

三种刷牙方法均能显著减少菌斑量。虽然改良巴氏刷牙法的短期效果良好,但长期效果不明显。此外,三组之间在菌斑控制方面无显著差异。牙龈评分、菌斑评分、刷牙方法、年轻成年人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8190/7018473/60fdb9d51c24/jced-12-e123-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8190/7018473/60fdb9d51c24/jced-12-e123-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8190/7018473/60fdb9d51c24/jced-12-e123-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of modified Bass, Fones and normal tooth brushing technique for the efficacy of plaque control in young adults- A randomized clinical trial.改良巴氏刷牙法、Fones刷牙法与普通刷牙法对年轻成年人牙菌斑控制效果的比较——一项随机临床试验
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Feb 1;12(2):e123-e129. doi: 10.4317/jced.55747. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Improving oral hygiene skills by computer-based training: a randomized controlled comparison of the modified Bass and the Fones techniques.通过基于计算机的培训来提高口腔卫生技能:改良 Bass 法与 Fones 技术的随机对照比较。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037072. Epub 2012 May 21.
3
Training in different brushing techniques in relation to efficacy of oral hygiene in young adults: a randomized controlled trial.针对年轻成年人不同刷牙技巧对口腔卫生效果的影响的培训:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Jan;43(1):46-52. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12489. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
4
Effectiveness of different tooth brushing techniques on the removal of dental plaque in 6-8 year old children of Gulbarga.不同刷牙方法对古尔伯加6 - 8岁儿童牙菌斑清除效果的研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014 May;4(2):113-6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.138305.
5
Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.将冲洗与牙线作为刷牙辅助手段的比较:对出血、牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(3):71-7.
6
Efficacy of two different toothbrush heads on a sonic power toothbrush compared to a manual toothbrush on established gingivitis and plaque.与手动牙刷相比,两种不同刷头的声波电动牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(4):65-70.
7
Comparison of Two Brushing Methods- Fone's vs Modified Bass Method in Visually Impaired Children Using the Audio Tactile Performance (ATP) Technique.两种刷牙方法的比较——在视力受损儿童中使用听觉触觉表现(ATP)技术比较冯氏刷牙法与改良巴氏刷牙法
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):ZC19-22. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11307.5651. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
8
Comparison of modified Bass technique with normal toothbrushing practices for efficacy in supragingival plaque removal.改良巴斯刷牙法与常规刷牙方法在清除龈上菌斑效果方面的比较。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2003 May;1(2):110-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-5037.2003.00018.x.
9
A four-week clinical study to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a baking soda dentifrice and an antimicrobial dentifrice in reducing plaque.一项为期四周的临床研究,旨在评估和比较小苏打牙膏和抗菌牙膏在减少牙菌斑方面的有效性。
J Clin Dent. 2008;19(4):120-6.
10
Comparison of the clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of manual and electric toothbrushes.手动牙刷和电动牙刷的临床效果及牙龈磨损情况比较。
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jan;28(1):65-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.280110.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of hand grip strength and bite force on the presence of plaque among adults aged 35-44 years in Mangalore - a cross-sectional study.芒格洛尔35-44岁成年人握力和咬合力与牙菌斑存在情况的关联——一项横断面研究
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Aug 6;18(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07406-w.
2
Plaque disclosing agent as a plaque control guide for oral hygiene in chronic periodontitis based on guided biofilm therapy: A retrospective cohort study.基于引导性生物膜治疗的牙菌斑显示剂作为慢性牙周炎口腔卫生菌斑控制指南:一项回顾性队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 6;104(23):e42782. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042782.
3
Exploring parental opinions on oral hygiene behavior and knowledge of their young children in Lithuania: a cross-sectional survey study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of Tooth Powder and Toothpaste in Young Adults in India: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2018 Oct 1;20(4):116-122.
2
Dental public health in India: An insight.印度的口腔公共卫生:洞察
J Family Med Prim Care. 2016 Oct-Dec;5(4):747-751. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.201155.
3
Fallacies of last observation carried forward analyses.末次观察结转分析的谬误
Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):161-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774515602688. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
探索立陶宛父母对其幼儿口腔卫生行为和知识的看法:一项横断面调查研究。
Front Oral Health. 2025 Apr 29;6:1530265. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1530265. eCollection 2025.
4
A Narrative Review on Advancing Pediatric Oral Health: Comprehensive Strategies for the Prevention and Management of Dental Challenges in Children.关于推进儿童口腔健康的叙述性综述:儿童牙齿问题预防与管理的综合策略
Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;12(3):286. doi: 10.3390/children12030286.
5
Effect of photobiomodulation on dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial.光生物调节对牙本质敏感的影响:一项随机对照双盲临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 24;29(1):84. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06149-z.
6
The Effectiveness of Probiotics on Oral Health During Adult Orthodontic Treatment With Fixed Appliances: A Two-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.益生菌对成人固定矫治器正畸治疗期间口腔健康的有效性:双臂平行组随机对照临床试验
Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73449. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73449. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Nudge Theory in Improving the Oral Self-Care of Schoolchildren with Refugee and Immigrant Backgrounds in Mashhad, Iran.评估助推理论对改善伊朗马什哈德有难民和移民背景学童口腔自我护理的有效性。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 19;12(7):228. doi: 10.3390/dj12070228.
8
Manual toothbrushing techniques for plaque removal and the prevention of gingivitis-A systematic review with network meta-analysis.手动刷牙技术去除牙菌斑和预防牙龈炎——系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 5;19(7):e0306302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306302. eCollection 2024.
9
Effectiveness of risk-based caries management among Chinese preschool children: a randomized controlled single-blind trial.基于风险的龋病管理在学龄前儿童中的效果:一项随机对照单盲试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 8;24(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04442-z.
10
Knowledge and attitude toward oral health behavior of overseas students during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间留学生口腔健康行为的知识和态度。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 28;23(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03420-1.
4
Effectiveness of different tooth brushing techniques on the removal of dental plaque in 6-8 year old children of Gulbarga.不同刷牙方法对古尔伯加6 - 8岁儿童牙菌斑清除效果的研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014 May;4(2):113-6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.138305.
5
An analysis of methods of toothbrushing recommended by dental associations, toothpaste and toothbrush companies and in dental texts.对牙科协会、牙膏及牙刷公司以及牙科文献中推荐的刷牙方法的分析。
Br Dent J. 2014 Aug;217(3):E5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.651.
6
Toothbrushing methods to use in children: a systematic review.
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2013;11(4):341-7. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a30602.
7
Improving oral hygiene skills by computer-based training: a randomized controlled comparison of the modified Bass and the Fones techniques.通过基于计算机的培训来提高口腔卫生技能:改良 Bass 法与 Fones 技术的随机对照比较。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037072. Epub 2012 May 21.
8
A 6-month comparison of toothbrushing efficacy between the horizontal Scrub and modified Bass methods in visually impaired students.在视障学生中,水平 Scrub 法和改良巴氏法刷牙效果的 6 个月比较。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011 Jul;21(4):278-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01120.x. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
9
Adoption of a toothbrushing technique: a controlled, randomised clinical trial.采用一种刷牙技术:一项对照、随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Feb;14(1):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0269-1. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
10
Comparison of modified Bass technique with normal toothbrushing practices for efficacy in supragingival plaque removal.改良巴斯刷牙法与常规刷牙方法在清除龈上菌斑效果方面的比较。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2003 May;1(2):110-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-5037.2003.00018.x.