Suppr超能文献

改良巴氏刷牙法、Fones刷牙法与普通刷牙法对年轻成年人牙菌斑控制效果的比较——一项随机临床试验

Comparison of modified Bass, Fones and normal tooth brushing technique for the efficacy of plaque control in young adults- A randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Janakiram Chandrashekar, Varghese Naveen, Venkitachalam Ramanarayanan, Joseph Joe, Vineetha Karuveettil

机构信息

Professor and Head, Department of Public Health Dentistry. Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, AIMS, Ponekkara P. O., Kochi 682041.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Feb 1;12(2):e123-e129. doi: 10.4317/jced.55747. eCollection 2020 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the anti plaque efficacy of Modified Bass, Fones and Normal brushing techniques in young adults.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An investigator blinded randomized controlled trial with parallel design was adopted to compare the anti plaque efficacy of three tooth brushing techniques. The study population consisted of 120 dental students aged between 18 and 30 years.

RESULTS

At the baseline, the mean plaque scores were 0.74 ± 0.39, 0.77 ± 0.34 and 0.98 ± 0.36 respectively, for Modified Bass, Fones and Normal brushing technique. After 24 hours without any oral hygiene activity, the plaque scores increased to 1.04 ± 0.30, 1.11 ± 0.32 and 1.21 ± 0.40, respectively. After 1 week of using the intervention, the mean plaque scores were 0.78 ± 0.36, 0.94 ± 0.34 and 1.03 ± 0.43, respectively and increased to 1.13 ± 0.44, 1.14 ± 0.40 and 1.08 ± 0.34 after 28 days. The mean gingival scores were 0.23 ± 0.66, 0.02 ± 0.52 and 0.42 ± 0.74 for Modified Bass, Fones and Normal Brushing technique during baseline visit and after 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant reduction in the amount of plaque with the three brushing techniques. Although the short-term outcomes with the Modified Bass method were promising, a long-term effect was not evident. Further, there was no significant difference in plaque control between the three groups. Gingival scores, plaque scores, tooth brushing techniques, young adults.

摘要

背景

比较改良巴氏刷牙法、Fones刷牙法和普通刷牙法在年轻成年人中的防菌斑效果。

材料与方法

采用单盲随机平行对照试验比较三种刷牙方法的防菌斑效果。研究对象为120名年龄在18至30岁之间的牙科专业学生。

结果

基线时,改良巴氏刷牙法、Fones刷牙法和普通刷牙法的平均菌斑评分分别为0.74±0.39、0.77±0.34和0.98±0.36。在24小时未进行任何口腔卫生活动后,菌斑评分分别增至1.04±0.30、1.11±0.32和1.21±0.40。在使用干预方法1周后,平均菌斑评分分别为0.78±0.36、0.94±0.34和1.03±0.43,28天后分别增至1.13±0.44、1.14±0.40和1.08±0.34。基线访视时及28天后,改良巴氏刷牙法、Fones刷牙法和普通刷牙法的平均牙龈评分为0.23±0.66、0.02±0.52和0.42±0.74。

结论

三种刷牙方法均能显著减少菌斑量。虽然改良巴氏刷牙法的短期效果良好,但长期效果不明显。此外,三组之间在菌斑控制方面无显著差异。牙龈评分、菌斑评分、刷牙方法、年轻成年人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8190/7018473/60fdb9d51c24/jced-12-e123-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验