Noll J D, Hawkins M W, Weinberg B
Cleft Palate J. 1977 Jul;14(3):200-5.
An assessment was made of oral manometric performance of normal speaking six- and seven-year-old boys. Readings of maximum, sustained, positive and negative pressure with bleed and nostrils occluded and open were obtained from each of forty subjects. It was found that the majority of normal speaking six- and seven-year-old boys had considerable difficulty generating and maintaining stable, maximal positive and negative pressure upon repeated trials of each of four manometric tasks. The findings of this project support the general hypothesis that oral manometric ratio data may be of questionable diagnostic value in predicting velopharyngeal adequacy for speech, particularly if ratio data must be interpreted dichotomously. The observations made were interpreted to support the view that there may be substantial differences even within the normal population in the ability to perform manometric tasks. The present results suggest that operational procedures commonly used during manometric testing merit rigorous scrutiny, re-examination and analysis.
对正常说话的6岁和7岁男孩进行了口腔测压性能评估。从40名受试者中的每一位获取了在鼻孔堵塞和开放情况下,出血时的最大、持续、正压和负压读数。结果发现,大多数正常说话的6岁和7岁男孩在对四项测压任务中的每一项进行重复试验时,在产生和维持稳定的最大正压和负压方面都有相当大的困难。该项目的研究结果支持了这样一个普遍假设,即口腔测压比率数据在预测语音腭咽功能是否充足方面的诊断价值可能存在疑问,特别是如果比率数据必须进行二分法解释的话。所做的观察结果被解释为支持这样一种观点,即即使在正常人群中,执行测压任务的能力也可能存在很大差异。目前的结果表明,测压测试中常用的操作程序值得进行严格审查、重新审视和分析。