Gonçalves Aurenaila Nascimento, da Frota Matheus Franco, Sponchiado Júnior Emilio Carlos, de Carvalho Fredson Marcio Acris, da Fonseca Roberti Garcia Lucas, Franco Marques André Augusto
Department of Endodontics, Superior School of Health Sciences, State University of Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
Department of Endodontics, Paulista University, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;18(6):436-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.168796.
To evaluate the apical transportation induced by two instrumentation techniques in severely curved simulated canals.
Forty simulated canals were divided into two groups (n = 20), according to the following instrumentation techniques: ProTaper Universal Manual System and a hybrid technique. The simulated canals in the ProTaper group were prepared following the technique recommended by the manufacturer: SX files in the cervical third of the root canal and S1, S2, and F1 files up to the working length. In the hybrid group, preparation was performed with K-files sizes 15, 20, and 25 to the working length, followed by cervical preparation with Gates Glidden burs 1, 2, and 3. Apical finishing was performed with the ProTaper manual files S2 and F1. To analyze apical transportation, the simulated canals were photographed before and after preparation at ×8. The images of the root canals pre- and post-instrumentation were superimposed to measure the distance between the inner and outer walls along the first 3 mm of the apical third.
The hybrid group presented the highest apical transportation values; however, with no statistically significant difference in comparison with the ProTaper group (P > 0.05).
Both techniques induced similar apical transportation in the original path of the simulated root canals.
评估两种根管预备技术在严重弯曲模拟根管中引起的根尖移位情况。
根据以下根管预备技术,将40个模拟根管分为两组(n = 20):ProTaper通用手动系统和一种混合技术。ProTaper组的模拟根管按照制造商推荐的技术进行预备:在根管颈段三分之一处使用SX锉,S1、S2和F1锉达到工作长度。在混合组中,先用15、20和25号K锉预备至工作长度,然后用1、2和3号Gates Glidden钻进行颈段预备。根尖修整使用ProTaper手动锉S2和F1。为分析根尖移位情况,在预备前后以×8放大倍数拍摄模拟根管照片。将根管预备前后的图像叠加,测量根尖三分之一段前3mm内、外壁之间的距离。
混合组呈现出最高的根尖移位值;然而,与ProTaper组相比,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
两种技术在模拟根管的原始路径中引起的根尖移位相似。