Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Univ Cruzeiro do Sul, São Paulo, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;27(1):26-30. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242012005000029. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
The aim of this study was to compare two endodontic preparation systems using micro-CT analysis. Twenty-four one-rooted mandibular premolars were selected and randomly assigned to two groups. The samples (n = 12) of Group 1 were prepared using the ProTaper Universal rotary system, while Group 2 (n = 12) was prepared using the EndoEZE AET system complemented by manual apical preparation with K-type hand files up to #30. A 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution was used in both groups for irrigating. Both groups were scanned by high-resolution microcomputed tomography before and after preparation (SkyScan 1172, SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium). The root canal volume and surface area was measured before and after preparation, and the differences were calculated and analyzed for statistically significant differences using ANOVA complemented by the Tukey test (p < 0.05). The results showed no statistically significant differences between the mean volumes of dentin removal by the two systems. However, the EndoEZE AET system presented a significantly greater mean surface area compared to the ProTaper system (p < 0.05). The EndoEZE AET system enabled preparation of a greater root canal surface area when compared to the ProTaper Universal system. There seemed to be no difference in dentin volume loss between the two systems used.
本研究旨在通过微 CT 分析比较两种根管预备系统。选择 24 颗单根下颌前磨牙,随机分为两组。第 1 组(n = 12)的样本采用 ProTaper Universal 旋转系统预备,第 2 组(n = 12)采用 EndoEZE AET 系统预备,并用 K 型手用锉手动预备至 #30。两组均用 2.5%次氯酸钠溶液冲洗。两组均在预备前后用高分辨率 microCT 扫描(SkyScan 1172,SkyScan,Kontich,比利时)。预备前后测量根管容积和表面积,用 ANOVA 检验并结合 Tukey 检验进行统计学分析(p < 0.05)。结果显示,两种系统的牙本质去除量均值无统计学差异。但 EndoEZE AET 系统的平均表面积明显大于 ProTaper 系统(p < 0.05)。与 ProTaper Universal 系统相比,EndoEZE AET 系统可预备更大的根管表面积。两种系统的牙本质体积损失似乎无差异。