Hughes Dyfrig, Charles Joanna, Dawoud Dalia, Edwards Rhiannon Tudor, Holmes Emily, Jones Carys, Parham Paul, Plumpton Catrin, Ridyard Colin, Lloyd-Williams Huw, Wood Eifiona, Yeo Seow Tien
Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Ardudwy, Bangor University, Holyhead Road, Wales, LL57 2PZ, UK.
Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 May;34(5):447-61. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0371-y.
Trial-based economic evaluations are an important aspect of health technology assessment. The availability of patient-level data coupled with unbiased estimates of clinical outcomes means that randomised controlled trials are effective vehicles for the generation of economic data. However there are methodological challenges to trial-based evaluations, including the collection of reliable data on resource use and cost, choice of health outcome measure, calculating minimally important differences, dealing with missing data, extrapolating outcomes and costs over time and the analysis of multinational trials. This review focuses on the state of the art of selective elements regarding the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of trial-based economic evaluations. The limitations of existing approaches are detailed and novel methods introduced. The review is internationally relevant but with a focus towards practice in the UK.
基于试验的经济评估是卫生技术评估的一个重要方面。患者层面数据的可用性以及对临床结果的无偏估计意味着随机对照试验是生成经济数据的有效工具。然而,基于试验的评估存在方法学挑战,包括收集关于资源使用和成本的可靠数据、健康结果测量指标的选择、计算最小重要差异、处理缺失数据、随时间外推结果和成本以及对跨国试验的分析。本综述聚焦于基于试验的经济评估在设计、实施、分析和报告方面的选择性要素的最新状况。详细阐述了现有方法的局限性,并介绍了新方法。该综述具有国际相关性,但重点关注英国的实践情况。