Dittmar Katharina, Zhu Qiyun, Hastriter Michael W, Whiting Michael F
Department of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo, Cooke 109, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
Graduate Program of Evolution, Ecology, and Behavior, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 411 Cooke Hall, Buffalo, NY, 14260, USA.
BMC Evol Biol. 2016 Jan 11;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0568-x.
Recently, a set of publications described flea fossils from Jurassic and Early Cretaceous geological strata in northeastern China, which were suggested to have parasitized feathered dinosaurs, pterosaurs, and early birds or mammals. In support of these fossils being fleas, a recent publication in BMC Evolutionary Biology described the extended abdomen of a female fossil specimen as due to blood feeding.We here comment on these findings, and conclude that the current interpretation of the evolutionary trajectory and ecology of these putative dinosaur fleas is based on appeal to probability, rather than evidence. Hence, their taxonomic positioning as fleas, or stem fleas, as well as their ecological classification as ectoparasites and blood feeders is not supported by currently available data.
最近,一系列出版物描述了来自中国东北侏罗纪和早白垩世地质层的跳蚤化石,这些化石被认为曾寄生在有羽毛的恐龙、翼龙、早期鸟类或哺乳动物身上。为支持这些化石是跳蚤的观点,《BMC进化生物学》最近发表的一篇论文将一个雌性化石标本的腹部扩张描述为吸食血液所致。我们在此对这些发现发表评论,并得出结论:目前对这些假定的恐龙跳蚤的进化轨迹和生态的解释是基于概率推断,而非证据。因此,目前可得的数据并不支持将它们分类为跳蚤或跳蚤祖先,以及将它们生态归类为体外寄生虫和吸血者。