Umeizudike K A, Ayanbadejo P O, Savage K O, Nwhator S O, Akanmu A S, Ogunleye O
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2016 Jan-Feb;19(1):35-40. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.164330.
There are diverse reports on the prevalence and severity of chronic periodontitis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive persons. Few studies have been carried out in developing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study was aimed at comparing the prevalence and severity of chronic periodontitis of HIV-seropositive patients with that of HIV-seronegative persons using the community periodontal index (CPI).
This was a comparative study of the periodontal status of 110 HIV-positive subjects and 110 age and gender-matched HIV-negative controls attending a dedicated HIV Clinic in a Teaching Hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. The CPI and simplified oral hygiene index score were used in the periodontal examination. Highest CPI scores and percentages of CPI sextants assessed the prevalence and severity of chronic periodontitis respectively. Logistic regression was used in adjusting demographic differences in the study population. P ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant.
A significant proportion of the HIV-positive patients 61 (55.5%) and the HIV-negative controls 53 (48.7%) had shallow pockets (4-5 mm) (CPI code 3). The prevalence of deep pockets (≥ 6mm) (CPI code 4) was higher among HIV-positive patients 9 (8.2%) than the controls 4 (3.5%) (P = 0.079). HIV-positive patients had a greater percentage of CPI codes 3, 4 and fewer CPI code 0 sextants than controls (P = 0.000). Both groups had comparable oral hygiene status (P = 0.209). Using a logistic regression analysis, HIV-positive status and lower education accounted for the greater severity of chronic periodontitis.
HIV-seropositive patients had more severe chronic periodontitis than the HIV-seronegative controls, which was independent of lower education.
关于人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)阳性者慢性牙周炎的患病率和严重程度,有各种各样的报道。在撒哈拉以南非洲的发展中国家开展的研究较少。本研究旨在使用社区牙周指数(CPI)比较HIV血清阳性患者与HIV血清阴性者慢性牙周炎的患病率和严重程度。
这是一项比较性研究,对在尼日利亚拉各斯一家教学医院的专门HIV诊所就诊的110名HIV阳性受试者和110名年龄及性别匹配的HIV阴性对照者的牙周状况进行研究。在牙周检查中使用CPI和简化口腔卫生指数评分。最高CPI评分和CPI象限百分比分别评估慢性牙周炎的患病率和严重程度。使用逻辑回归分析来调整研究人群中的人口统计学差异。P≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
相当比例的HIV阳性患者61例(55.5%)和HIV阴性对照者53例(48.7%)有浅牙周袋(4 - 5毫米)(CPI代码3)。HIV阳性患者中深牙周袋(≥6毫米)(CPI代码4)的患病率9例(8.2%)高于对照者4例(3.5%)(P = 0.079)。与对照者相比,HIV阳性患者的CPI代码3、4的象限百分比更高,而CPI代码0的象限更少(P = 0.000)。两组的口腔卫生状况相当(P = 0.209)。使用逻辑回归分析,HIV阳性状态和较低的教育程度是慢性牙周炎更严重的原因。
HIV血清阳性患者比HIV血清阴性对照者患有更严重的慢性牙周炎,且这与较低的教育程度无关。