Roy Sanjoy, Carlton Rashad, Weisberg Martin, Clark Ryan, Migliaccio-Walle Kristen, Chapa Hector
Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson), Somerville, New Jersey 08876.
Xcenda, Palm Harbor, Florida 34685.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2015;25(3):245-52. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2015012140.
We used an economic model to assess the impact of using the GYNECARE INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier for reducing the incidence of postoperative adhesions in open surgical gynecologic procedures. Caesarean section surgery, hysterectomy, myomectomy, ovarian surgery, tubal surgery, and endometriosis surgery were modeled with and without the use of GYNECARE INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier. Incremental GYNECARE INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier material costs, medical costs arising from complications, and adhesion-related readmissions were considered. GYNECARE INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier use was assumed in 75% of all procedures. The economic impact was reported during a 3-year period from a United States hospital perspective. Assuming 100 gynecologic surgeries of each type and an average of one GYNECARE INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier sheet per surgery, a net savings of $540,823 with GYNECARE INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier during 3 years is estimated. In addition, GYNECARE INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier use resulted in 62 fewer cases of patients developing adhesions. Although the use of GYNECARE INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier added $137,250 in material costs, this was completely offset by the reduction in length of stay ($178,766 savings), fewer adhesion-related readmissions ($458,220 savings), and operating room cost ($41,078 savings). Adoption of the GYNECARE INTERCEED absorbable adhesion barrier for appropriate gynecologic surgeries would likely result in significant savings for hospitals, driven primarily by clinical patient benefits in terms of decreased length of stay and adhesion-related readmissions.
我们使用了一种经济模型来评估在妇科开放性手术中使用GYNECARE INTERCEED可吸收防粘连屏障对降低术后粘连发生率的影响。对剖宫产手术、子宫切除术、子宫肌瘤切除术、卵巢手术、输卵管手术和子宫内膜异位症手术进行了建模,比较使用和不使用GYNECARE INTERCEED可吸收防粘连屏障的情况。考虑了GYNECARE INTERCEED可吸收防粘连屏障材料的增量成本、并发症产生的医疗成本以及与粘连相关的再次入院费用。假设在所有手术中有75%使用GYNECARE INTERCEED可吸收防粘连屏障。从美国一家医院的角度报告了3年期间的经济影响。假设每种类型的妇科手术有100例,且每次手术平均使用一张GYNECARE INTERCEED可吸收防粘连屏障片,估计使用GYNECARE INTERCEED可吸收防粘连屏障在3年内可净节省540,823美元。此外,使用GYNECARE INTERCEED可吸收防粘连屏障使发生粘连的患者病例减少了62例。尽管使用GYNECARE INTERCEED可吸收防粘连屏障增加了137,250美元的材料成本,但住院时间缩短带来的节省(节省178,766美元)、与粘连相关的再次入院减少带来的节省(节省458,220美元)以及手术室成本的节省(节省41,078美元)完全抵消了这一成本。在适当的妇科手术中采用GYNECARE INTERCEED可吸收防粘连屏障可能会为医院带来显著的节省,这主要是由临床患者在住院时间缩短和与粘连相关的再次入院方面的获益所推动的。