Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):185-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16994.
Chronic constipation accounts for at least 8 million annual visits to health care providers in the United States and is associated with large expenditures for diagnostic testing and prescription and nonprescription laxatives.
Strong evidence for efficacy has been established for stimulant and osmotic laxatives, new intestinal secretogogues, and peripherally restricted μ-opiate receptor antagonists, the latter a major advance in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC). An algorithm provided to evaluate chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) that is refractory to available laxatives focuses on the importance of defecation disorders and biofeedback therapies. When used appropriately, available stimulant laxatives such as senna and bisacodyl are both safe and effective when used long-term. There is a paucity of (and a strong desire for) studies that compare inexpensive laxatives with newer agents that work by other mechanisms.
The choice of treatment for CIC and OIC should be based on cost as well as efficacy. The small subgroup of patients who do not respond to currently available laxatives requires further evaluation at experienced centers that are capable of performing studies of defecation and colonic transit.
慢性便秘导致至少 800 万美国人每年前往医疗保健提供者处就诊,并且与用于诊断测试以及处方和非处方轻泻剂的大量支出相关。
刺激性和渗透性轻泻剂、新型肠分泌剂和外周受限的μ阿片受体拮抗剂的疗效已得到充分证实,后者是治疗阿片类药物引起的便秘(OIC)的重大进展。提供了一种用于评估对现有轻泻剂无反应的慢性特发性便秘(CIC)的算法,该算法侧重于排便障碍和生物反馈疗法的重要性。当适当地使用时,长期使用安全性和有效性均得到证实的现有刺激性轻泻剂,如番泻叶和比沙可啶。比较廉价轻泻剂与通过其他机制起作用的新型药物的研究很少(并且强烈需要这些研究)。
CIC 和 OIC 的治疗选择应基于成本和疗效。对于那些对目前可用的轻泻剂没有反应的一小部分患者,需要在有能力进行排便和结肠转运研究的有经验的中心进行进一步评估。