Hewison N S
Life Sciences Library, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Oct;77(4):332-6.
The emergence of CD-ROM (compact disc/read-only memory) versions of the MEDLINE database requires experienced MEDLINE searchers to examine assumptions about searching MEDLINE, since some expectations may not be fulfilled by this new technology. When applied to a particular CD-ROM MEDLINE product, the evaluation procedure involves testing assumptions concerning database contents; mechanics of searching; display, print, and download capabilities; and user-friendly features. The extent to which a CD-ROM product preserves and exploits important MEDLINE strengths should be assessed, e.g., the MeSH controlled vocabulary, the designation of major and minor MeSH emphasis, and the use of subheadings. Search software characteristics that affect ease of searching and quality of results also need to be examined, e.g., the ability to truncate search terms and the order of precedence in which Boolean operators are evaluated. A checklist to assist in the evaluation process is presented, including search examples for use in testing search functions.
MEDLINE数据库光盘(只读存储光盘)版本的出现,要求有经验的MEDLINE检索人员审视有关检索MEDLINE的种种设想,因为这项新技术可能无法满足某些期望。当应用于某一特定的MEDLINE光盘产品时,评估程序包括测试有关数据库内容、检索机制、显示、打印和下载功能以及用户友好特性的种种设想。应评估光盘产品在多大程度上保留并利用了MEDLINE的重要优势,例如医学主题词(MeSH)受控词汇表、主要和次要MeSH重点的指定以及副标题的使用。还需要检查影响检索便捷性和结果质量的检索软件特性,例如截断检索词的能力以及布尔运算符的求值优先顺序。本文提供了一份有助于评估过程的清单,包括用于测试检索功能的检索示例。